These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27243616)

  • 1. Neural Measures Reveal Implicit Learning during Language Processing.
    Batterink LJ; Cheng LY; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1636-49. PubMed ID: 27243616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.
    Fine AB; Jaeger TF; Farmer TA; Qian T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77661. PubMed ID: 24204909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phrase length matters: the interplay between implicit prosody and syntax in Korean "garden path" sentences.
    Hwang H; Steinhauer K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3555-75. PubMed ID: 21391765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiology of prosodic and lexical-semantic processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia.
    Sheppard SM; Love T; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Shapiro LP
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Dec; 107():9-24. PubMed ID: 29061490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re-examination of Chinese semantic processing and syntactic processing: evidence from conventional ERPs and reconstructed ERPs by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE).
    Wang F; Ouyang G; Zhou C; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0117324. PubMed ID: 25615600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension.
    Dave S; Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1768():147573. PubMed ID: 34216583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia.
    Peristeri E; Tsimpli IM; Dardiotis E; Tsapkini K
    Aphasiology; 2020; 34(8):943-969. PubMed ID: 32952261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When readers fail to form a coherent representation of garden-path sentences.
    Chromý J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jan; 75(1):169-190. PubMed ID: 34289762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cooperating and conflicting prosody in spoken English garden path sentences: ERP evidence for the boundary deletion hypothesis.
    Pauker E; Itzhak I; Baum SR; Steinhauer K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2731-51. PubMed ID: 21281091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sentence-based mental simulations: Evidence from behavioral experiments using garden-path sentences.
    Schütt E; Dudschig C; Bergen BK; Kaup B
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):952-965. PubMed ID: 36307639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency-based Segregation of Syntactic and Semantic Unification during Online Sentence Level Language Comprehension.
    Bastiaansen M; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2095-107. PubMed ID: 26042498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences.
    Malaia E; Wilbur RB; Weber-Fox C
    Brain Lang; 2009 Mar; 108(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 18945484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.
    Payne BR; Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1456-69. PubMed ID: 26311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambiguous function words do not prevent 18-month-olds from building accurate syntactic category expectations: An ERP study.
    Brusini P; Dehaene-Lambertz G; van Heugten M; de Carvalho A; Goffinet F; Fiévet AC; Christophe A
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():4-12. PubMed ID: 27544044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    Eckstein K; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 15967649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring in language perception: evidence from ERPs in a picture-sentence matching task.
    Vissers CT; Kolk HH; van de Meerendonk N; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):967-82. PubMed ID: 18199460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandarin Chinese L1 and L2 complex sentence reading reveals a consistent electrophysiological pattern of highly interactive syntactic and semantic processing: An ERP study.
    Chen L; Yang M; Gao F; Fang Z; Wang P; Feng L
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1143062. PubMed ID: 37151349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.