168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27243898)
1. Optimal design of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-test.
Bürkner PC; Doebler P; Holling H
Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 27243898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Happ M; Bathke AC; Brunner E
Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):363-375. PubMed ID: 30298671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
McGee M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical research XVI. Differences between medians with the Mann-Whitney U test].
Rivas-Ruiz R; Moreno-Palacios J; Talavera JO
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2013; 51(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 24021070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exemplary data set sample size calculation for Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests.
Divine G; Kapke A; Havstad S; Joseph CL
Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 19890884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals with other rank-based methods for the two-sample problem in ordered categorical data.
Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):371-385. PubMed ID: 36533908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power and sample size estimation for the Wilcoxon rank sum test with application to comparisons of C statistics from alternative prediction models.
Rosner B; Glynn RJ
Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 18510654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical significance levels of nonparametric tests biased by heterogeneous variances of treatment groups.
Zimmerman DW
J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 11109998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size determination for testing whether an identified treatment is best.
Horn M; Vollandt R; Dunnett CW
Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):879-81. PubMed ID: 10985230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental comparison of parametric versus nonparametric analyses of data from the cold pressor test.
Treister R; Nielsen CS; Stubhaug A; Farrar JT; Pud D; Sawilowsky S; Oaklander AL
J Pain; 2015 Jun; 16(6):537-48. PubMed ID: 25801300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Relative Power of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test and Student t Test Under Simple Bounded Transformations.
Zimmerman DW; Zumbo BD
J Gen Psychol; 1990 Oct; 117(4):425-436. PubMed ID: 28142339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions?
Skovlund E; Fenstad GU
J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 54(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 11165471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Fay MP; Malinovsky Y
Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):3991-4006. PubMed ID: 29984411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
Vickers AJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test: stratify or not?
Qu Y; Zhao YD; Rahardja D
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18991110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An optimal Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test of mortality and a continuous outcome.
Matsouaka RA; Singhal AB; Betensky RA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2384-2400. PubMed ID: 27920364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A powerful and robust test statistic for randomization inference in group-randomized trials with matched pairs of groups.
Zhang K; Traskin M; Small DS
Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 21732926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exact log-rank tests for unequal follow-up.
Heinze G; Gnant M; Schemper M
Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1151-7. PubMed ID: 14969496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
