100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27244351)
1. The production effect in recognition memory: Weakening strength can strengthen distinctiveness.
Bodner GE; Jamieson RK; Cormack DT; McDonald DL; Bernstein DM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 27244351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the basis of the between-group production effect in recognition.
Taikh A; Bodner GE
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 27244360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?
Lambert AM; Bodner GE; Taikh A
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 27244358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Production between and within: distinctiveness and the relative magnitude of the production effect.
Zhou Y; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2021 Feb; 29(2):168-179. PubMed ID: 33427599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reassessing the basis of the production effect in memory.
Bodner GE; Taikh A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1711-9. PubMed ID: 22563636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The d-Prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates.
Forrin ND; Groot B; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1090-111. PubMed ID: 26820499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The production effect in memory: evidence that distinctiveness underlies the benefit.
Ozubko JD; Macleod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1543-7. PubMed ID: 20804284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memory.
Bodner GE; Huff MJ; Taikh A
Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1281-1294. PubMed ID: 32399916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A preliminary investigation into the neural basis of the production effect.
Hassall CD; Quinlan CK; Turk DJ; Taylor TL; Krigolson OE
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 27244355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computational account of the production effect: Still playing twenty questions with nature.
Jamieson RK; Mewhort DJ; Hockley WE
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 27244357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aging and the production effect: a test of the distinctiveness account.
Lin OY; MacLeod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 22686153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
MacLeod CM; Gopie N; Hourihan KL; Neary KR; Ozubko JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):671-85. PubMed ID: 20438265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Remembered study mode: support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect.
Ozubko JD; Major J; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2014; 22(5):509-24. PubMed ID: 23713784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The drawing effect: Evidence for costs and benefits using pure and mixed lists.
Huff MJ; Namias JM; Poe P
Mem Cognit; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38519781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms underlying the production effect for singing.
Quinlan CK; Taylor TL
Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Dec; 73(4):254-264. PubMed ID: 31393154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Directed forgetting meets the production effect: distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting.
Hourihan KL; Macleod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 19071992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. List-method directed forgetting: Evidence for the reset-of-encoding hypothesis employing item-recognition testing.
Pastötter B; Kliegl O; Bäuml KH
Memory; 2016; 24(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 25483244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural correlates of the production effect: An fMRI study.
Bailey LM; Bodner GE; Matheson HE; Stewart BM; Roddick K; O'Neil K; Simmons M; Lambert AM; Krigolson OE; Newman AJ; Fawcett JM
Brain Cogn; 2021 Aug; 152():105757. PubMed ID: 34130081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. I said, you said: the production effect gets personal.
MacLeod CM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1197-202. PubMed ID: 21938642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory presentation at test does not diminish the production effect in recognition.
Forrin ND; MacLeod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 27244353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
