100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27244351)
41. The production effect in memory: multiple species of distinctiveness.
Icht M; Mama Y; Algom D
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():886. PubMed ID: 25157237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A negative semantic similarity effect on short-term order memory: evidence from recency judgements.
Tse CS
Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):638-56. PubMed ID: 20687000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ageing and secondary-distinctiveness-based effects: the orthographic distinctiveness effect is more robust than the bizarreness effect.
Gounden Y; Nicolas S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1820-32. PubMed ID: 22524538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect.
Meeks JT; Knight JB; Brewer GA; Cook GI; Marsh RL
Conscious Cogn; 2014 Feb; 24():57-69. PubMed ID: 24419222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Order information is used to guide recall of long lists: Further evidence for the item-order account.
Forrin ND; MacLeod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 27244354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.
Criss AH
Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A closer look at children's metacognitive skills: The case of the distinctiveness heuristic.
Geurten M; Meulemans T; Willems S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():130-148. PubMed ID: 29605654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Testing the item-order account of design effects using the production effect.
Jonker TR; Levene M; Macleod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):441-8. PubMed ID: 24219087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Serial recall, word frequency, and mixed lists: the influence of item arrangement.
Miller LM; Roodenrys S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1731-40. PubMed ID: 22582964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
Hourihan KL; Smith AR
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Perceptual blurring and recognition memory: A desirable difficulty effect revealed.
Rosner TM; Davis H; Milliken B
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():11-22. PubMed ID: 26134415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Auditioning the distinctiveness account: Expanding the production effect to the auditory modality reveals the superiority of writing over vocalising.
Mama Y; Icht M
Memory; 2016; 24(1):98-113. PubMed ID: 25483326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.
Ratcliff R; Clark SE; Shiffrin RM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 2137859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Rehearsal strategies can enlarge or diminish the spacing effect: pure versus mixed lists and encoding strategy.
Delaney PF; Verkoeijen PP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1148-61. PubMed ID: 19686011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Production benefits learning: the production effect endures and improves memory for text.
Ozubko JD; Hourihan KL; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2012; 20(7):717-27. PubMed ID: 22827717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The production effect benefits performance in between-subject designs: a meta-analysis.
Fawcett JM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Jan; 142(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 23142670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.
Verde MF; Rotello CM
Mem Cognit; 2007 Mar; 35(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 17645166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Pupil size changes during recognition memory.
Otero SC; Weekes BS; Hutton SB
Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1346-53. PubMed ID: 21575007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Initial category cues and recognition memory foils for the Cognistat Verbal Memory alternate word list.
Brzezinski SB; Fouty HE; Rennells MJ; Gatto MS; Kamps CL; Crespin LM
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2012; 19(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 23373601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Secondary distinctiveness effects: Orthographic distinctiveness and bizarreness effects make independent contributions to memory performance.
Gounden Y; Cerroti F; Nicolas S
Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 27859302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
