These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27244351)

  • 61. Faces forming traces: neurophysiological correlates of learning naturally distinctive and caricatured faces.
    Schulz C; Kaufmann JM; Kurt A; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):491-500. PubMed ID: 22796993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Are children conservative, liberal, or metacognitive? Preliminary evidence for the involvement of the distinctiveness heuristic in decision making.
    Geurten M; Willems S; Meulemans T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():230-9. PubMed ID: 25701224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1194-209. PubMed ID: 14622055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Assessing why the testing effect is moderated by experimental design.
    Mulligan NW; Buchin ZL; West JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1293-1308. PubMed ID: 31697142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory.
    Opitz B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jul; 73(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 20493623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs non-elaborative processing.
    Forrin ND; Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):470-80. PubMed ID: 23705973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Distinctiveness effects in recall: differential processing or privileged retrieval?
    Waddill PJ; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jan; 26(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 9519701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Congruency effects on recognition memory: a context effect.
    Rosner TM; Milliken B
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Jun; 69(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 25774995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.
    Franks BA; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 27400995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Pre-learning stress differentially affects long-term memory for emotional words, depending on temporal proximity to the learning experience.
    Zoladz PR; Clark B; Warnecke A; Smith L; Tabar J; Talbot JN
    Physiol Behav; 2011 Jul; 103(5):467-76. PubMed ID: 21262248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The effects of pure pair repetition on younger and older adults' associative memory.
    Kilb A; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):706-19. PubMed ID: 21341929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Characterizing production: the production effect is eliminated for unusual voices unless they are frequent at study.
    Wakeham-Lewis RM; Ozubko J; Fawcett JM
    Memory; 2022 Nov; 30(10):1319-1333. PubMed ID: 36107805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Providing support for distinctive processing: the isolation effect in young and older adults.
    Smith RE
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Sep; 26(3):744-51. PubMed ID: 21604888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Does variability in recognition memory scale with mean memory strength or encoding variability in the UVSD model?
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2037-2052. PubMed ID: 36274514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms.
    Shiffrin RM; Ratcliff R; Clark SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):179-95. PubMed ID: 2137860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Homogeneity of item material boosts the list length effect in recognition memory: A global matching perspective.
    Brandt M; Zaiser AK; Schnuerch M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):834-850. PubMed ID: 29985029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Modeling short- and long-term memory contributions to recent event recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Cao R; Harding SM; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):316-342. PubMed ID: 32105142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Productions Need Not Match Study Items to Confer a Production Advantage, But It Helps.
    Kelly MO; Lu X; Ensor TM; MacLeod CM; Risko EF
    Exp Psychol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38504629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory.
    McClelland JL; Chappell M
    Psychol Rev; 1998 Oct; 105(4):724-60. PubMed ID: 9830377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.