BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27244781)

  • 41. Imaging for Suspected Appendicitis: Variation Between Academic and Private Practice Models.
    Menoch M; Simon HK; Hirsh D; Shim Y; Baxter AL; Clifton M; Kim D; Sturm JJ
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2017 Mar; 33(3):147-151. PubMed ID: 27050738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Diagnostic imaging and negative appendectomy rates in children: effects of age and gender.
    Bachur RG; Hennelly K; Callahan MJ; Chen C; Monuteaux MC
    Pediatrics; 2012 May; 129(5):877-84. PubMed ID: 22508920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Three-step sequential positioning algorithm during sonographic evaluation for appendicitis increases appendiceal visualization rate and reduces CT use.
    Chang ST; Jeffrey RB; Olcott EW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):1006-12. PubMed ID: 25341138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED.
    McKay R; Shepherd J
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Jun; 25(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 17543650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Economic Analysis of Diagnostic Imaging in Pediatric Patients With Suspected Appendicitis.
    Kharbanda AB; Christensen EW; Dudley NC; Bajaj L; Stevenson MD; Macias CG; Mittal MK; Bachur RG; Bennett JE; Sinclair K; McMichael B; Dayan PS;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2018 Jul; 25(7):785-794. PubMed ID: 29427374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis.
    Howell JM; Eddy OL; Lukens TW; Thiessen ME; Weingart SD; Decker WW;
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Jan; 55(1):71-116. PubMed ID: 20116016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of Hispanic ethnicity and language barriers on appendiceal perforation rates and imaging in children.
    Levas MN; Dayan PS; Mittal MK; Stevenson MD; Bachur RG; Dudley NC; Bajaj L; Macias CG; Bennett J; Dowd MD; Thomas AJ; Kharbanda AB;
    J Pediatr; 2014 Jun; 164(6):1286-91.e2. PubMed ID: 24565425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Missed appendicitis: did unexpected intraluminal densities play a role?
    Harper R; Friedman BT; Strote J
    BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Sep; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27605197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Routine ultrasound and limited computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
    Toorenvliet BR; Wiersma F; Bakker RF; Merkus JW; Breslau PJ; Hamming JF
    World J Surg; 2010 Oct; 34(10):2278-85. PubMed ID: 20582544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Advanced radiologic imaging for pediatric appendicitis, 2005-2009: trends and outcomes.
    Bachur RG; Hennelly K; Callahan MJ; Monuteaux MC
    J Pediatr; 2012 Jun; 160(6):1034-8. PubMed ID: 22192815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Is appendiceal CT scan overused for evaluating patients with right lower quadrant pain?
    Safran DB; Pilati D; Folz E; Oller D
    Am J Emerg Med; 2001 May; 19(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 11326344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Value of Focused Appendicitis Ultrasound and Alvarado Score in Predicting Appendicitis in Children: Can We Reduce the Use of CT?
    Blitman NM; Anwar M; Brady KB; Taragin BH; Freeman K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W707-12. PubMed ID: 26001260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Trends in the rates of radiography use and important diagnoses in emergency department patients with abdominal pain.
    Pines JM
    Med Care; 2009 Jul; 47(7):782-6. PubMed ID: 19536032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Staged imaging pathway for the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis.
    Chien M; Habis A; Glynn L; O'Connor A; Smith TL; Prendergast F
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2016 Jul; 32(7):671-8. PubMed ID: 27142212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay.
    Foley TA; Earnest F; Nathan MA; Hough DM; Schiller HJ; Hoskin TL
    Radiology; 2005 Apr; 235(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15749978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Suspected acute appendicitis in female patients. Trends in diagnosis in emergency department in a University Hospital in Western region of Saudi Arabia.
    Althoubaity FK
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Nov; 27(11):1667-73. PubMed ID: 17106538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical Relevance of the Nonvisualized Appendix on Ultrasonography of the Abdomen in Children.
    Nah SA; Ong SS; Lim WX; Amuddhu SK; Tang PH; Low Y
    J Pediatr; 2017 Mar; 182():164-169.e1. PubMed ID: 28010937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prospective evaluation of MRI compared with CT for the etiology of abdominal pain in emergency department patients with concern for appendicitis.
    Harringa JB; Bracken RL; Davis JC; Mao L; Kitchin DR; Robbins JB; Ziemlewicz TJ; Pickhardt PJ; Reeder SB; Repplinger MD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1651-1658. PubMed ID: 30892788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Increasing computed tomography use for patients with appendicitis and discrepancies in pain management between adults and children: an analysis of the NHAMCS.
    Tsze DS; Asnis LM; Merchant RC; Amanullah S; Linakis JG
    Ann Emerg Med; 2012 May; 59(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 21802777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prospective validation of a biomarker panel to identify pediatric ED patients with abdominal pain who are at low risk for acute appendicitis.
    Huckins DS; Simon HK; Copeland K; Milling TJ; Spandorfer PR; Hennes H; Allen C; Gogain J;
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 34(8):1373-82. PubMed ID: 27133536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.