123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27244855)
21. Attitudes Toward Risk and Informed Consent for Research on Medical Practices: A Cross-sectional Survey.
Cho MK; Magnus D; Constantine M; Lee SS; Kelley M; Alessi S; Korngiebel D; James C; Kuwana E; Gallagher TH; Diekema D; Capron AM; Joffe S; Wilfond BS
Ann Intern Med; 2015 May; 162(10):690-6. PubMed ID: 25868119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Public Attitudes Toward Expanded Newborn Screening.
DeLuca JM
J Pediatr Nurs; 2018; 38():e19-e23. PubMed ID: 29033105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Influence of Education on Public Trust and Consent Preferences With Residual Newborn Screening Dried Blood spots.
Rothwell E; Wong B; Anderson RA; Botkin JR
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 27387457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Information and consent for newborn screening: practices and attitudes of service providers.
Kerruish NJ; Webster D; Dickson N
J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):648-52. PubMed ID: 18757632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Parental intentions to enroll children in a voluntary expanded newborn screening program.
Paquin RS; Peay HL; Gehtland LM; Lewis MA; Bailey DB
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Oct; 166():17-24. PubMed ID: 27526258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical obligations and public health programmes: healthcare provider reasoning about managing the incidental results of newborn screening.
Miller FA; Hayeems RZ; Bombard Y; Little J; Carroll JC; Wilson B; Allanson J; Paynter M; Bytautas JP; Christensen R; Chakraborty P
J Med Ethics; 2009 Oct; 35(10):626-34. PubMed ID: 19793944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What's Involved with Wanting to Be Involved? Comparing Expectations for Public Engagement in Health Policy across Research and Care Contexts.
Barg CJ; Miller FA; Hayeems RZ; Bombard Y; Cressman C; Painter-Main M
Healthc Policy; 2017 Nov; 13(2):40-56. PubMed ID: 29274226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Attitude to extended use and long-term storage of newborn screening blood spots in Japan.
Fujii C; Sato Y; Harada S; Kakee N; Gu YH; Kato T; Shintaku H; Owada M; Hirahara F; Umehashi H; Yoshino M
Pediatr Int; 2010 Jun; 52(3):393-7. PubMed ID: 20003144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Policy issues and stakeholder concerns regarding the storage and use of residual newborn dried blood samples for research.
Rothwell E; Anderson R; Botkin J
Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2010 Feb; 11(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 20457727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Informing New Mothers about Newborn Screening Bloodspot Repositories during Postpartum Hospitalization.
Newcomb P; True B; Wells JN; Walsh J; Pehl S
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2019; 44(6):332-337. PubMed ID: 31633523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Public attitudes regarding a pilot study of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy.
Rothwell E; Anderson RA; Swoboda KJ; Stark L; Botkin JR
Am J Med Genet A; 2013 Apr; 161A(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 23443997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Public preferences for seeking publicly financed dental care and professional preferences for structuring it.
Quiñonez C; Figueiredo R; Azarpazhooh A; Locker D
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 38(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 20447197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Public Perceptions of the Benefits and Risks of Newborn Screening.
Miller FA; Hayeems RZ; Bombard Y; Cressman C; Barg CJ; Carroll JC; Wilson BJ; Little J; Allanson J; Chakraborty P; Giguère Y; Regier DA
Pediatrics; 2015 Aug; 136(2):e413-23. PubMed ID: 26169426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Obtaining consent from both parents for pediatric research: what does "reasonably available" mean?
Nelson DK; Skinner D; Guarda S; Choudhury S; Sideris J; Barnum L; Ten Haagen K; Heyward Q; Bailey DB
Pediatrics; 2013 Jan; 131(1):e223-9. PubMed ID: 23266920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Newborn dried blood spot screening: residual specimen storage issues.
Therrell BL; Hannon WH
Pediatrics; 2012 Feb; 129(2):365-6. PubMed ID: 22250020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. An Assessment of Public Preferences for Newborn Screening Using Best-Worst Scaling.
Tarini BA; Simon NJ; Payne K; Gebremariam A; Rose A; Prosser LA
J Pediatr; 2018 Oct; 201():62-68.e1. PubMed ID: 30025667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study.
Jansen ME; van den Bosch LJM; Hendriks MJ; Scheffer MMJ; Heijnen ML; Douglas CMW; van El CG
BMC Pediatr; 2019 Jul; 19(1):230. PubMed ID: 31288776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions?
Willison DJ; Steeves V; Charles C; Schwartz L; Ranford J; Agarwal G; Cheng J; Thabane L
BMC Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 10():10. PubMed ID: 19630941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?
Johri M; Damschroder LJ; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Kim SY; Ubel PA
J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 19103946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Government and charity funding of cancer research: public preferences and choices.
Shah KK; Sussex J; Hernandez-Villafuerte K
Health Res Policy Syst; 2015 Sep; 13():38. PubMed ID: 26335693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
