BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27245620)

  • 41. Imaging-Based 4D Aortic Pressure Mapping in Marfan Syndrome Patients: A Matched Case-Control Study.
    Leidenberger T; Gordon Y; Farag M; Delles M; Fava Sanches A; Fink MA; Kallenbach K; Kauczor HU; Rengier F
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 May; 109(5):1434-1440. PubMed ID: 31568745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of aortic valve gradient during exercise after aortic valve reconstruction.
    Graeter TP; Kindermann M; Fries R; Langer F; Schäfers HJ
    Chest; 2000 Nov; 118(5):1271-7. PubMed ID: 11083674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Visualization of flow patterns distal to aortic valve prostheses in humans using a fast approach for cine 3D velocity mapping.
    Kozerke S; Hasenkam JM; Pedersen EM; Boesiger P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 May; 13(5):690-8. PubMed ID: 11329190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Three-dimensional haemodynamics in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Allen BD; Choudhury L; Barker AJ; van Ooij P; Collins JD; Bonow RO; Carr JC; Markl M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 16(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25108915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scan-rescan reproducibility of segmental aortic wall shear stress as assessed by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers.
    van der Palen RLF; Roest AAW; van den Boogaard PJ; de Roos A; Blom NA; Westenberg JJM
    MAGMA; 2018 Oct; 31(5):653-663. PubMed ID: 29804208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In vitro evaluation of flow patterns and turbulent kinetic energy in trans-catheter aortic valve prostheses.
    Giese D; Weiss K; Baeßler B; Madershahian N; Choi YH; Maintz D; Bunck AC
    MAGMA; 2018 Feb; 31(1):165-172. PubMed ID: 28921052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The role of the sinuses of Valsalva in aortic root flow dynamics and aortic root surgery: evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Schoenhoff FS; Loupatatzis C; Immer FF; Stoupis C; Carrel TP; Eckstein FS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 19852141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contemporary outcomes of surgery for aortic root aneurysms: A propensity-matched comparison of valve-sparing and composite valve graft replacement.
    Gaudino M; Lau C; Munjal M; Avgerinos D; Girardi LN
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Nov; 150(5):1120-9.e1. PubMed ID: 26234456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is the Lecompte technique the last word on transposition of the great arteries repair for all patients? A magnetic resonance imaging study including a spiral technique two decades postoperatively.
    Rickers C; Kheradvar A; Sievers HH; Falahatpisheh A; Wegner P; Gabbert D; Jerosch-Herold M; Hart C; Voges I; Putman LM; Kristo I; Fischer G; Scheewe J; Kramer HH
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 22(6):817-25. PubMed ID: 26920722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of Marfan patients status post valve-sparing aortic root replacement with 4D flow.
    Hope TA; Kvitting JP; Hope MD; Miller DC; Markl M; Herfkens RJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 31(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 23706513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Seismocardiography and 4D flow MRI reveal impact of aortic valve replacement on chest acceleration and aortic hemodynamics.
    Johnson EMI; Etemadi M; Malaisrie SC; McCarthy PM; Markl M; Barker AJ
    J Card Surg; 2020 Jan; 35(1):232-235. PubMed ID: 31614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Modified versus standard mechanical valved aortic conduit.
    Urbanski PP; Dinstak W; Frank S; Siebel A; Hacker RW
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2005 Mar; 13(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 15793052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Aortic root replacement with a mechanical valve and prosthetic conduit for the complicated degeneration of the ascending aorta resulting from infective endocarditis.
    Inaba H; Kaneko T; Ezure M; Sato Y; Hasegawa Y; Shibasaki I
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Oct; 13(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 17954997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Aortic Root Replacement With Autologous Pericardium Valved Conduit.
    Seese L; Yoon P; Morell VO; Chu D
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Mar; 113(3):e227-e229. PubMed ID: 33971175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating a Phase-Specific Approach to Aortic Flow: A 4D Flow MRI Study.
    Ramaekers MJFG; Westenberg JJM; Venner MFGHM; Juffermans JF; van Assen HC; Te Kiefte BJC; Adriaans BP; Lamb HJ; Wildberger JE; Schalla S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Mar; 59(3):1056-1067. PubMed ID: 37309838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Long-Term Hemodynamic Performance of the Aortic Valve After David I: An Echocardiographic Study.
    Mignosa C; Mariani C; Deste W; Felis S; Di Stefano S; Giuffrida A; Rubino AS
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015; 27(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 26708365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Aortic flow patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome assessed by flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI.
    Geiger J; Markl M; Herzer L; Hirtler D; Loeffelbein F; Stiller B; Langer M; Arnold R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Mar; 35(3):594-600. PubMed ID: 22095635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Haemodynamic performance of a new pericardial aortic bioprosthesis during exercise and recovery: comparison with pulmonary autograft, stentless aortic bioprosthesis and healthy control groups.
    Hanke T; Charitos EI; Paarmann H; Stierle U; Sievers HH
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 44(4):e295-301. PubMed ID: 23872458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biological solutions to aortic root replacement: valve-sparing versus bioprosthetic conduit‡.
    Gaudino M; Di Franco A; Ohmes LB; Weltert L; Lau C; Gambardella I; Salica A; Munjal M; Elsayed M; Girardi LN; De Paulis R;
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jun; 24(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 28329094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.