These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27245879)

  • 21. Development and validation of an OECD reproductive toxicity test guideline with the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis (Mollusca, Gastropoda).
    Ducrot V; Askem C; Azam D; Brettschneider D; Brown R; Charles S; Coke M; Collinet M; Delignette-Muller ML; Forfait-Dubuc C; Holbech H; Hutchinson T; Jach A; Kinnberg KL; Lacoste C; Le Page G; Matthiessen P; Oehlmann J; Rice L; Roberts E; Ruppert K; Davis JE; Veauvy C; Weltje L; Wortham R; Lagadic L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Dec; 70(3):605-14. PubMed ID: 25220624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A retrospective analysis of the added value of the rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study versus the rat subchronic toxicity study.
    Janer G; Hakkert BC; Piersma AH; Vermeire T; Slob W
    Reprod Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 24(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17600672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigations on learning and memory function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies - when considered needed and based on what?
    Arts JHE; Faulhammer F; Schneider S; Salverda JGW
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2023 Jul; 53(6):372-384. PubMed ID: 37540214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Juvenile toxicity testing protocols for chemicals.
    Piersma AH; Tonk EC; Makris SL; Crofton KM; Dietert RR; van Loveren H
    Reprod Toxicol; 2012 Nov; 34(3):482-6. PubMed ID: 22564981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combined retrospective analysis of 498 rat multi-generation reproductive toxicity studies: on the impact of parameters related to F1 mating and F2 offspring.
    Piersma AH; Rorije E; Beekhuijzen ME; Cooper R; Dix DJ; Heinrich-Hirsch B; Martin MT; Mendez E; Muller A; Paparella M; Ramsingh D; Reaves E; Ridgway P; Schenk E; Stachiw L; Ulbrich B; Hakkert BC
    Reprod Toxicol; 2011 May; 31(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 21130863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Infant toxicology: state of the science and considerations in evaluation of safety.
    Neal-Kluever A; Aungst J; Gu Y; Hatwell K; Muldoon-Jacobs K; Liem A; Ogungbesan A; Shackelford M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Aug; 70():68-83. PubMed ID: 24824476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonhuman primates as animal models for toxicology research.
    Burbacher TM; Grant KS
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2001; Chapter 1():Unit1.1. PubMed ID: 23045019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SIDS reprotoxicity screening test update: testing strategies and use.
    Gelbke HP; Fleig H; Meder M;
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Apr; 39(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 15041141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Critical aspects in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.
    Buschmann J
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16782303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The underestimated value of OECD 421 and 422 repro screening studies: putting it in the right perspective.
    Beekhuijzen M; de Raaf MA; Zmarowski A; van Otterdijk F; Peter B; Emmen H
    Reprod Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 48():81-7. PubMed ID: 24768663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the conduct and reporting of the T-cell dependent antibody response in the Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study provided under the EU REACH regulation.
    Vandebriel RJ; Hakkert B; Pennings JLA; Rossi LH; Bichlmaier I; Bil W
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2024 Jul; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 39041360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comments from the Developmental Neurotoxicology Committee of the Japanese Teratology Society on the OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Proposal for a New Guideline 426, Developmental Neurotoxicity Study, Draft Document (October 2006 version), and on the Draft Document of the Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Draft Test Guideline 426 on Developmental Neurotoxicity.
    Ema M; Fukui Y; Aoyama H; Fujiwara M; Fuji J; Inouye M; Iwase T; Kihara T; Oi A; Otani H; Shinomiya M; Sugioka K; Yamano T; Yamashita KH; Tanimura T;
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2007 Jun; 47(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 17504392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of the OECD reproduction test guideline with the New Zealand mudsnail Potamopyrgus antipodarum using trenbolone and prochloraz.
    Geiß C; Ruppert K; Askem C; Barroso C; Faber D; Ducrot V; Holbech H; Hutchinson TH; Kajankari P; Kinnberg KL; Lagadic L; Matthiessen P; Morris S; Neiman M; Penttinen OP; Sanchez-Marin P; Teigeler M; Weltje L; Oehlmann J
    Ecotoxicology; 2017 Apr; 26(3):370-382. PubMed ID: 28168557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The nonclinical fertility study design for pharmaceuticals.
    Lerman SA; Hew KW; Stewart J; Stump DG; Wise LD
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Dec; 86(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 20025039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Regarding the references for reference chemicals of alternative methods.
    Kolle SN; Hill E; Raabe H; Landsiedel R; Curren R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Jun; 57():48-53. PubMed ID: 30738888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Developmental immunotoxicity of chemicals in rodents and its possible regulatory impact.
    Hessel EV; Tonk EC; Bos PM; van Loveren H; Piersma AH
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 25372701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. To mate or not to mate: a retrospective analysis of two-generation studies for evaluation of criteria to trigger additional mating in the extended one-generation design.
    Beekhuijzen M; Zmarowski A; Emmen H; Frieling W
    Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 19426798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.