These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27246436)
1. A Note on the Linearly and Quadratically Weighted Kappa Coefficients. Li P Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):795-801. PubMed ID: 27246436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Brenner H; Kliebsch U Epidemiology; 1996 Mar; 7(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 8834562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A New Interpretation of the Weighted Kappa Coefficients. Vanbelle S Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 25516203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the Weighted Kappa and Its Maximum with Markov Moves. Rapallo F Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1270-1289. PubMed ID: 35113317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of grey zones on the accuracy of agreement measures for ordinal tables. Tran QD; Dolgun A; Demirhan H BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):70. PubMed ID: 33853549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes. Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Alternative Interpretation of the Linearly Weighted Kappa Coefficients for Ordinal Data. Kvålseth TO Psychometrika; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29766350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian approaches to the weighted kappa-like inter-rater agreement measures. Tran QD; Demirhan H; Dolgun A Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2329-2351. PubMed ID: 34448633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance enterography has good inter-rater agreement and diagnostic accuracy for detecting inflammation in pediatric Crohn disease. Church PC; Greer MC; Cytter-Kuint R; Doria AS; Griffiths AM; Turner D; Walters TD; Feldman BM Pediatr Radiol; 2017 May; 47(5):565-575. PubMed ID: 28283726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Gwet KL Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The inter and intra rater reliability of the Netball Movement Screening Tool. Reid DA; Vanweerd RJ; Larmer PJ; Kingstone R J Sci Med Sport; 2015 May; 18(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 24930074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are the Naranjo criteria reliable and valid for determination of adverse drug reactions in the intensive care unit? Kane-Gill SL; Kirisci L; Pathak DS Ann Pharmacother; 2005 Nov; 39(11):1823-7. PubMed ID: 16204392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using digital subtraction angiography tumor blush. Clausen C; Dahl B; Christiansen Frevert S; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Lönn L Acta Radiol; 2017 Jun; 58(6):734-739. PubMed ID: 27650032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appropriate Statistics for Determining Chance-Removed Interpractitioner Agreement. Popplewell M; Reizes J; Zaslawski C J Altern Complement Med; 2019 Nov; 25(11):1115-1120. PubMed ID: 29851495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-rater agreement on assessment of outcome within a trauma registry. Ekegren CL; Hart MJ; Brown A; Gabbe BJ Injury; 2016 Jan; 47(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 26304002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robustness of Vanacore A; Pellegrino MS Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1986-2004. PubMed ID: 35124830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]