These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27246520)

  • 21. Neighborhood Frequency Effect in Chinese Word Recognition: Evidence from Naming and Lexical Decision.
    Li MF; Gao XY; Chou TL; Wu JT
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):227-245. PubMed ID: 27119658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Extraction of linguistic information from successive words during reading: evidence for spatially distributed lexical processing.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):662-77. PubMed ID: 23088508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bilinguals apply language-specific grain sizes during sentence reading.
    Egan C; Oppenheim GM; Saville C; Moll K; Jones MW
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104018. PubMed ID: 31336311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words.
    Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Doré-Mazars K
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):2009-17. PubMed ID: 15149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reading sentences of words with rotated letters: An eye movement study.
    Blythe HI; Juhasz BJ; Tbaily LW; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1790-1804. PubMed ID: 30328773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.
    Schotter ER; Fennell AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31512087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eye movements during reading and topic scanning: effects of word frequency.
    White SJ; Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 25528014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Revisiting Huey: on the importance of the upper part of words during reading.
    Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1148-53. PubMed ID: 22895885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rapid extraction of gist from visual text and its influence on word recognition.
    Asano M; Yokosawa K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(2):127-54. PubMed ID: 21560469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are emojis processed like words?: Eye movements reveal the time course of semantic processing for emojified text.
    Barach E; Feldman LB; Sheridan H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):978-991. PubMed ID: 33511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: evidence from eye movements.
    Slattery TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1969-75. PubMed ID: 19968447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-lingual neighborhood effects in generalized lexical decision and natural reading.
    Dirix N; Cop U; Drieghe D; Duyck W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):887-915. PubMed ID: 28095009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations.
    Juhasz BJ; Starr MS; Inhoff AW; Placke L
    Br J Psychol; 2003 May; 94(Pt 2):223-44. PubMed ID: 12803817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial.
    Carter BT; Luke SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):482-492. PubMed ID: 28816481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Non-selective lexical access in bilinguals is spontaneous and independent of input monitoring: evidence from eye tracking.
    Wu YJ; Cristino F; Leek C; Thierry G
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):418-25. PubMed ID: 23999407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of anomalous characters and small stroke omissions on eye movements during the reading of Chinese sentences.
    Liu P; Li W; Han B; Li X
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(11):1659-69. PubMed ID: 25105833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.