165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27246722)
21. Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 IB to IIB Cervical Cancer Staging: Comparison Among Magnetic Resonance Sequences and Pathologies.
Matsumoto YK; Kido A; Moribata Y; Chigusa Y; Himoto Y; Kurata Y; Otani S; Yajima R; Nishio N; Kuwahara R; Minamiguchi S; Mandai M; Nakamoto Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):829-836. PubMed ID: 34407060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cervical carcinoma: do fast SE and fat suppression techniques improve MR tumor staging at 0.5 T?
Postema S; Peters LA; Hermans J; Trimbos JB; Pattynama PM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(5):807-11. PubMed ID: 8797918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers for MRI-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy: novel marker-flange for cervical cancer and marker catheters for prostate cancer.
Schindel J; Muruganandham M; Pigge FC; Anderson J; Kim Y
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jun; 86(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 23433797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of real-time sonoelastography with T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection.
Aigner F; Pallwein L; Schocke M; Lebovici A; Junker D; Schäfer G; Mikuz G; Pedross F; Horninger W; Jaschke W; Halpern EJ; Frauscher F
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 May; 30(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 21527612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in the locoregional staging of rectal carcinoma].
Masi A; Olmastroni M; Lascialfari L; Messerini L; Fucini C; Cataliotti L; Ficari F; Tonelli F
Radiol Med; 1995 Oct; 90(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 8552820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Diagnostic Accuracy and Postoperative Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Patients for MR-invisible or MR-visible Diagnosis of Combined T2- and Diffusion-weighted 3T MRI Using the External Phased-array Receiver.
Roh HJ; Go EB; Kim KB; Lee JH; Lee SH
Anticancer Res; 2019 Dec; 39(12):6945-6956. PubMed ID: 31810966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fast dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma.
Van Vierzen PB; Massuger LF; Ruys SH; Barentsz JO
Clin Radiol; 1998 Mar; 53(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 9528868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Lymph node staging in cervix carcinomas: the results of high-resolution magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) with a phased-array body coil].
Heuck A; Scheidler J; Kimmig R; Müller-Lisse U; Steinborn M; Helmberger T; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Mar; 166(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 9156591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. MRI and Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Cervical Cancer.
Théodore C; Levaillant JM; Capmas P; Chabi N; Skalli D; Vienet-Legué L; Haddad B; Fernandez H; Touboul C
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5079-5085. PubMed ID: 28870937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Magnetic resonance with an endorectal coil and a fast spin echo sequence in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. The correlation with histopathological data].
Masi A; Olmastroni M; Marin E; Consalvo M; Lascialfari L; Ricupero L; Nicita G; Villari D; Amorosi A; Villari N
Radiol Med; 1997 Nov; 94(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 9465216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression.
Scheidler J; Heuck AF; Steinborn M; Kimmig R; Reiser MF
Radiology; 1998 Jan; 206(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 9423661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical gross tumor volume dose predicts local control using magnetic resonance imaging/diffusion-weighted imaging-guided high-dose-rate and positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Dyk P; Jiang N; Sun B; DeWees TA; Fowler KJ; Narra V; Garcia-Ramirez JL; Schwarz JK; Grigsby PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(4):794-801. PubMed ID: 25245584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantification of delineation errors of the gross tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging in uterine cervical cancer using pathology data and deformation correction.
van de Schoot AJ; de Boer P; Buist MR; Stoker J; Bleeker MC; Stalpers LJ; Rasch CR; Bel A
Acta Oncol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 25437811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can a single-shot black-blood T2-weighted spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence with sensitivity encoding replace the respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequence for the liver? An optimization and feasibility study.
Hussain SM; De Becker J; Hop WC; Dwarkasing S; Wielopolski PA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 15723376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
