BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27248650)

  • 1. Radiation Protection Clothing in X-Ray Diagnostics - Influence of the Different Methods of Measurement on the Lead Equivalent and the Required Mass.
    Schöpf T; Pichler T
    Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):768-75. PubMed ID: 27248650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Radiation protection clothing in X-ray diagnostics - comparison of attenuation equivalents in narrow beam and inverse broad-beam geometry].
    Pichler T; Schöpf T; Ennemoser O
    Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 21246474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?].
    Eder H; Panzer W; Schöfer H
    Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 15719303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. X-Ray protective clothing: does DIN 6857-1 allow an objective comparison between lead-free and lead-composite materials?
    Eder H; Schlattl H; Hoeschen C
    Rofo; 2010 May; 182(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 20143286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.
    Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063902. PubMed ID: 23718618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
    Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
    Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Examination of optimal radiation quality in the lead equivalent examination of X-ray protective clothing].
    Inoue S; Matsumoto M; Matsuzawa R
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1682-7. PubMed ID: 15614219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. IEC 61331-1: A new setup for testing lead free X-ray protective clothing.
    Eder H; Schlattl H
    Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():6-11. PubMed ID: 29472092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attenuation of X and Gamma Rays in Personal Radiation Shielding Protective Clothing.
    Kozlovska M; Cerny R; Otahal P
    Health Phys; 2015 Nov; 109(3 Suppl 3):S205-11. PubMed ID: 26425983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emission of fluorescent x-radiation from non-lead based shielding materials of protective clothing: a radiobiological problem?
    Schmid E; Panzer W; Schlattl H; Eder H
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):N129-39. PubMed ID: 22809876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
    McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments.
    McCaffrey JP; Shen H; Downton B; Mainegra-Hing E
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 17388170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
    Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
    Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated.
    Eder H
    Rofo; 2023 Mar; 195(3):234-243. PubMed ID: 36796379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shielding properties of lead-free protective clothing and their impact on radiation doses.
    Schlattl H; Zankl M; Eder H; Hoeschen C
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4270-80. PubMed ID: 18072491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
    Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray buildup factors of lead and its applications in shielding of diagnostic x-ray facilities.
    Kharrati H; Agrebi A; Karaoui MK
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17500471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-62. PubMed ID: 25771561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.