These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27249056)

  • 1. How Accurate Are Home Blood Pressure Devices in Use? A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Ruzicka M; Akbari A; Bruketa E; Kayibanda JF; Baril C; Hiremath S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155677. PubMed ID: 27249056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can validated wrist devices with position sensors replace arm devices for self-home blood pressure monitoring? A randomized crossover trial using ambulatory monitoring as reference.
    Stergiou GS; Christodoulakis GR; Nasothimiou EG; Giovas PP; Kalogeropoulos PG
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Jul; 21(7):753-8. PubMed ID: 18443566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
    Ringrose JS; Polley G; McLean D; Thompson A; Morales F; Padwal R
    Am J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 30(7):683-689. PubMed ID: 28430848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou EG; Protogerou AD
    J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Nov; 22(11):796-800. PubMed ID: 18596720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Selection and maintenance of the blood pressure monitor for self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM)].
    Wiliński J; Kusiak A; Wiliński B; Smolik P; Klima Ł; Chmielewska J; Czarnecka D
    Przegl Lek; 2013; 70(11):900-3. PubMed ID: 24697026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the A&D UA-1020 upper-arm blood pressure monitor for home blood pressure monitoring according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
    Zeng WF; Kang YY; Liu M; Li Y; Wang JG
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Jun; 18(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 23571228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: executive summary: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.
    Pickering TG; Miller NH; Ogedegbe G; Krakoff LR; Artinian NT; Goff D; ; ;
    Hypertension; 2008 Jul; 52(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18497371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.
    Pickering TG; Miller NH; Ogedegbe G; Krakoff LR; Artinian NT; Goff D; ; ;
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(4):299-323. PubMed ID: 18596492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou EG; Karpettas N; Protogerou A
    J Hum Hypertens; 2010 Mar; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 19609285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Systolic blood pressures are not comparable when home blood pressure is measured with a wrist or an arm validated monitor].
    Dourmap-Collas C; Girerd X; Begasse F; Marquand A; Asplanato M; Jaboureck O; Fourcade J; Pierre Justin E; Hottelard C; Hanon O;
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2005; 98(7-8):774-8. PubMed ID: 16220746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of ambulatory blood pressure monitors in routine clinical practice.
    Pang TC; Brown MA
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Aug; 19(8):801-9. PubMed ID: 16876678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the Andon KD-5851 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.
    Wu L; Jiao Y; Wang C; Chen L; Di D; Zhang H
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Aug; 20(4):228-31. PubMed ID: 25768062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unreliable oscillometric blood pressure measurement: prevalence, repeatability and characteristics of the phenomenon.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D; Baibas NM
    J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Dec; 23(12):794-800. PubMed ID: 19322203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of an ambulatory blood pressure measuring device and a wrist blood pressure monitor with a position sensor versus a mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Altunkan S; Genç Y; Altunkan E
    Eur J Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 18(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17338963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of home blood pressure monitoring: in the context of validation and accuracy.
    Jung MH; Kim GH; Kim JH; Moon KW; Yoo KD; Rho TH; Kim CM
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Aug; 20(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 25856420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two home blood pressure monitors with a mercury sphygmomanometer in an ambulatory population.
    Johnson KA; Partsch DJ; Gleason P; Makay K
    Pharmacotherapy; 1999 Mar; 19(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 10221371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel and simple protocol for the validation of home blood pressure monitors in clinical practice.
    Eguchi K; Kuruvilla S; Ishikawa J; Schwartz JE; Pickering TG
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Oct; 17(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 22797517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of home blood pressure monitoring devices in pregnancy.
    Tremonti C; Beddoe J; Brown MA
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2017 Apr; 8():9-14. PubMed ID: 28501284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.