174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2724940)
1. Comparison of contact pressures measured at the sacrum of young and elderly subjects.
Clark M; Rowland LB
J Biomed Eng; 1989 May; 11(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 2724940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microcirculatory responses of sacral tissue in healthy individuals and inpatients on different pressure-redistribution mattresses.
Bergstrand S; Källman U; Ek AC; Engström M; Lindgren M
J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):346-58. PubMed ID: 26562377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The physiological response of skin tissues to alternating support pressures in able-bodied subjects.
Chai CY; Bader DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Dec; 28():427-35. PubMed ID: 23791952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interface pressure characteristics of alternating air cell mattresses in persons with spinal cord injury.
Goetz LL; Brown GS; Priebe MM
J Spinal Cord Med; 2002; 25(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 12214903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization.
Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.
Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8031686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a new clinical mattress solution on interface pressure and comfort during supine lying.
Webb JA; Chohan A
J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(8):513-518. PubMed ID: 37572343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interface Pressures of New and Worn Standard and Viscoelastic Hospital Mattresses: A Comparative Study.
Bredesen IM
Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Aug; 66(8):26-31. PubMed ID: 32732440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement over the sacrum on various anti-decubitus mattresses.
Jakobsen J; Christensen KS
Dan Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 34(6):330-1. PubMed ID: 3436160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
McInnes E; Bell-Syer SE; Dumville JC; Legood R; Cullum NA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD001735. PubMed ID: 18843621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of position and mattress overlay on sacral and heel pressures in a clinical population.
Sideranko S; Quinn A; Burns K; Froman RD
Res Nurs Health; 1992 Aug; 15(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 1496149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supine interface pressure in children.
Solis I; Krouskop T; Trainer N; Marburger R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Jul; 69(7):524-6. PubMed ID: 3389994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressure signatures can influence tissue response for individuals supported on an alternating pressure mattress.
Chai CY; Sadou O; Worsley PR; Bader DL
J Tissue Viability; 2017 Aug; 26(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 28602246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determining the optimal inner air cell pressure for the effective reduction of interface pressure.
Sasaki N; Nakagami G; Sakai K; Yamamoto Y; Kato H; Nanjo Y; Sanada H
J Tissue Viability; 2012 May; 21(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 22542135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A study of contact pressure points in specialised beds.
Ryan DW; Byrne P
Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1989 Nov; 10(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 2632137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of interface pressures measured at the sacrum while resting upon two types of foam mattresses and between platilon and plastic mattress covers.
Clark M; Andrews J
Age Ageing; 1991 Jul; 20(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 1927733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preventing pressure sores in elderly patients: a comparison of seven mattress overlays.
Bliss MR
Age Ageing; 1995 Jul; 24(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 7484486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interface pressure at different degrees of backrest elevation with various types of pressure-redistribution surfaces.
Lippoldt J; Pernicka E; Staudinger T
Am J Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 23(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 24585160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of interface pressures in two dynamic pressure ulcer prevention supports (NIMBUS 3 and SUMMIT): A randomized controlled trial.
de Labachelerie C; Viollet E; Alonso S; Nouvel F; Bastide S; Blot M; Fagart W; Gélis A; Dupeyron A
J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 34598852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
