These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2724940)

  • 21. Comparison of the effectiveness of assisted turning mattresses and conventional air mattresses in relieving body pressure in different lying positions.
    Wu SV; Kuo LM; Tsai JM; Lin LJ; Chu CH; Liao YY
    Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 36(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 36445182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of position and mattress on interface pressure.
    Defloor T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 Feb; 13(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 10701278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pressure-reducing capability of the Therarest hospital replacement mattress.
    Rojas MG; Reynolds A
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1996 Mar; 23(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 8845887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of alternating-pressure air mattresses using a time-based pressure threshold technique and continuous measurements of transcutaneous gases.
    Rithalia SV; Heath GH; Gonsalkorale M
    J Tissue Viability; 2000 Jan; 10(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10839091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
    Cullum N; McInnes E; Bell-Syer SE; Legood R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001735. PubMed ID: 15266452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of total body tissue interface pressure of specialized pressure-relieving mattresses.
    Hickerson WL; Slugocki GM; Thaker RL; Dunkan R; Bishop JF; Parks JK
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004; 14(2):81-94. PubMed ID: 15099186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing the effects of 3 different pressure ulcer prevention support surfaces on the structure and function of heel and sacral skin: An exploratory cross-over trial.
    Tomova-Simitchieva T; Lichterfeld-Kottner A; Blume-Peytavi U; Kottner J
    Int Wound J; 2018 Jun; 15(3):429-437. PubMed ID: 29277963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Potential for bed sores due to high pressures: influence of body sites, body position, and mattress design.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    Br J Clin Pract; 1993; 47(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 8260338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Oxy-Mat™ Mattress System Development Utilizing Simultaneous Measurement of Interface Pressure and Deep Tissue Oxygen Saturation.
    Butler GJ; Kenyon DJ; Gorenstein S; Davenport T; Golembe E; Lee B; Vieweg J
    Surg Technol Int; 2015 May; 26():71-82. PubMed ID: 26054994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preventing pressure sores: matching patient and mattress using interface pressure measurements.
    Clark M; Rowland LB
    Decubitus; 1989 Feb; 2(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 2751833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.
    Rondorf-Klym LM; Langemo D
    Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 8427641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes in sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension in the evaluation of different mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers.
    Colin D; Loyant R; Abraham P; Saumet JL
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8688975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Egerton Convertible II and the Elite 3 bed system.
    Lowthian P
    Br J Nurs; 1996 Jan 25-Feb 7; 5(2):118, 120-3. PubMed ID: 8680245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevention of pressure ulcer: interaction of body characteristics and different mattresses.
    Moysidis T; Niebel W; Bartsch K; Maier I; Lehmann N; Nonnemacher M; Kroeger K
    Int Wound J; 2011 Dec; 8(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 21999615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of alternating air mattresses using a time-based interface pressure threshold technique.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9651895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of alternating pressure air mattresses: one laboratory-based strategy.
    Rithalia SV
    J Tissue Viability; 2004 Apr; 14(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 15114927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Thermo contour mattress.
    Hampton S
    Br J Nurs; 1999 Aug 12-Sep 8; 8(15):990-6. PubMed ID: 10711028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pressure ulcer incidence and progression in critically ill subjects: influence of low air loss mattress versus a powered air pressure redistribution mattress.
    Black J; Berke C; Urzendowski G
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 22552108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laboratory performance of alternating pressure air mattresses component and sequelae.
    Bain D
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Nov 10-23; 20(20):S29-34. PubMed ID: 22067933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.