285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27250152)
1. Can the elongated hindwing tails of fluttering moths serve as false sonar targets to divert bat attacks?
Lee WJ; Moss CF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2579. PubMed ID: 27250152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wingtip folds and ripples on saturniid moths create decoy echoes against bat biosonar.
Neil TR; Kennedy EE; Harris BJ; Holderied MW
Curr Biol; 2021 Nov; 31(21):4824-4830.e3. PubMed ID: 34506731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution of anti-bat sensory illusions in moths.
Rubin JJ; Hamilton CA; McClure CJW; Chadwell BA; Kawahara AY; Barber JR
Sci Adv; 2018 Jul; 4(7):eaar7428. PubMed ID: 29978042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moth tails divert bat attack: evolution of acoustic deflection.
Barber JR; Leavell BC; Keener AL; Breinholt JW; Chadwell BA; McClure CJ; Hill GM; Kawahara AY
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(9):2812-6. PubMed ID: 25730869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tiger moth jams bat sonar.
Corcoran AJ; Barber JR; Conner WE
Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5938):325-7. PubMed ID: 19608920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How do tiger moths jam bat sonar?
Corcoran AJ; Barber JR; Hristov NI; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2011 Jul; 214(Pt 14):2416-25. PubMed ID: 21697434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Echolocation behavior of the Japanese horseshoe bat in pursuit of fluttering prey.
Mantani S; Hiryu S; Fujioka E; Matsuta N; Riquimaroux H; Watanabe Y
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2012 Oct; 198(10):741-51. PubMed ID: 22777677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Echolocating bats accumulate information from acoustic snapshots to predict auditory object motion.
Salles A; Diebold CA; Moss CF
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(46):29229-29238. PubMed ID: 33139550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Echolocation of insects using intermittent frequency-modulated sounds.
Matsuo I; Takanashi T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL276-9. PubMed ID: 26428826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of bat echolocation call duration and timing on auditory encoding of predator distance in noctuoid moths.
Gordon SD; Ter Hofstede HM
J Exp Biol; 2018 Mar; 221(Pt 6):. PubMed ID: 29567831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats.
Moss CF; Surlykke A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2207-26. PubMed ID: 11681397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic camouflage increases with body size and changes with bat echolocation frequency range in a community of nocturnally active Lepidoptera.
Simon R; Dreissen A; Leroy H; Berg MP; Halfwerk W
J Anim Ecol; 2023 Dec; 92(12):2363-2372. PubMed ID: 37882060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High duty cycle moth sounds jam bat echolocation: bats counter with compensatory changes in buzz duration.
Fernández Y; Dowdy NJ; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2022 Sep; 225(18):. PubMed ID: 36111562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach.
Ratcliffe JM; Fullard JH
J Exp Biol; 2005 Dec; 208(Pt 24):4689-98. PubMed ID: 16326950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High duty cycle echolocation and prey detection by bats.
Lazure L; Fenton MB
J Exp Biol; 2011 Apr; 214(Pt 7):1131-7. PubMed ID: 21389198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.
Corcoran AJ; Hristov NI
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Sep; 200(9):811-21. PubMed ID: 24980483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High duty cycle pulses suppress orientation flights of crambid moths.
Nakano R; Ihara F; Mishiro K; Toyama M; Toda S
J Insect Physiol; 2015 Dec; 83():15-21. PubMed ID: 26549128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.
Cobo-Cuan A; Kössl M; Mora EC
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Sep; 203(9):707-715. PubMed ID: 28421281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense.
Corcoran AJ; Conner WE
J Exp Biol; 2012 Dec; 215(Pt 24):4278-87. PubMed ID: 23175526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tempo and mode of antibat ultrasound production and sonar jamming in the diverse hawkmoth radiation.
Kawahara AY; Barber JR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 May; 112(20):6407-12. PubMed ID: 25941377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
