These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27250164)

  • 21. Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):923-33. PubMed ID: 16158648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2181-92. PubMed ID: 15898659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time and frequency metrics related to auditory masking of a 10 kHz tone in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).
    Branstetter BK; Trickey JS; Aihara H; Finneran JJ; Liberman TR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4556. PubMed ID: 25669265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Behavioural estimates of auditory filter widths in ferrets using notched-noise maskers.
    Alves-Pinto A; Sollini J; Wells T; Sumner CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):EL19-24. PubMed ID: 26936579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Depth matters - Towards finding an objective neurophysiological measure of behavioral amplitude modulation detection based on neural threshold determination.
    Waechter SM; Lopez Valdes A; Simoes-Franklin C; Viani L; Reilly RB
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():13-22. PubMed ID: 29291949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do we need STRFs for cocktail parties? On the relevance of physiologically motivated features for human speech perception derived from automatic speech recognition.
    Kollmeier B; Schädler MR; Meyer A; Anemüller J; Meyer BT
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():333-41. PubMed ID: 23716239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.