BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27250197)

  • 1. Gaps-in-noise detection and gender identification from noise-vocoded vowel segments: Comparing performance of active musicians to non-musicians.
    Donai JJ; Jennings MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL128. PubMed ID: 27250197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Free RH; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL159-65. PubMed ID: 24606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception.
    Başkent D; Gaudrain E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL51-6. PubMed ID: 27036287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effects of Musical Training on Speech Detection in the Presence of Informational and Energetic Masking.
    Morse-Fortier C; Parrish MM; Baran JA; Freyman RL
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517739427. PubMed ID: 29161982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.
    Deroche MLD; Limb CJ; Chatterjee M; Gracco VL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):1739. PubMed ID: 29092612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory detection of non-speech and speech stimuli in noise: Native speech advantage.
    Huo S; Tao S; Wang W; Li M; Dong Q; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL161. PubMed ID: 27250202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Musician effect on perception of spectro-temporally degraded speech, vocal emotion, and music in young adolescents.
    Başkent D; Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Schepel L; Gaudrain E; Free RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):EL311. PubMed ID: 29857757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vowel and tone recognition in quiet and in noise among Mandarin-speaking amusics.
    Tang W; Wang XJ; Li JQ; Liu C; Dong Q; Nan Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():62-69. PubMed ID: 29534831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of pitch height in lexical and musical tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.
    Lee CY; Lekich A; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1607-15. PubMed ID: 24606295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
    Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced auditory temporal gap detection in listeners with musical training.
    Mishra SK; Panda MR; Herbert C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL173-8. PubMed ID: 25096143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing musicians and non-musicians in signal-in-noise perception.
    Zhang F; Roland C; Rasul D; Cahn S; Liang C; Valencia G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):717-723. PubMed ID: 31187671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.