These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2725081)

  • 1. Patients' reactions and physician-patient communication in a mandatory surgical second-opinion program.
    Rosenberg SN; Gorman SA; Snitzer S; Herbst EV; Lynne D
    Med Care; 1989 May; 27(5):466-77. PubMed ID: 2725081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of nonconfirmation rates. Experiences of a surgical second opinion program.
    Paris M; Salsberg E; Berenson L
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(22):2424-7. PubMed ID: 490854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of second-opinion consultation programs: a cost-benefit perspective.
    Ruchlin HS; Finkel ML; McCarthy EG
    Med Care; 1982 Jan; 20(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 6804722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' reflections on communication in the second-opinion hematology-oncology consultation.
    Goldman RE; Sullivan A; Back AL; Alexander SC; Matsuyama RK; Lee SJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jul; 76(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19135824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Second opinions for elective surgery. The mandatory medicaid program in Massachusetts.
    Gertman PM; Stackpole DA; Levenson DK; Manuel BM; Brennan RJ; Janko GM
    N Engl J Med; 1980 May; 302(21):1169-74. PubMed ID: 6767983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of inter-physician communication on the effectiveness of medical consultations.
    Lee T; Pappius EM; Goldman L
    Am J Med; 1983 Jan; 74(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 6849320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motives for seeking a second opinion in orthopaedic surgery.
    van Dalen I; Groothoff J; Stewart R; Spreeuwenberg P; Groenewegen P; van Horn J
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2001 Oct; 6(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 11685782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there evidence for a better health care for cancer patients after a second opinion? A systematic review.
    Ruetters D; Keinki C; Schroth S; Liebl P; Huebner J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Jul; 142(7):1521-8. PubMed ID: 26687791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Procedure-specific costs and savings in a mandatory program for second opinion on surgery.
    Barr JK; Schachter M; Rosenberg SN; Factor-Litvak P; McGarvey MR; Leto L
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1990 Jan; 16(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 2107487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing clinical decisions about care through a pre-consultation sheet that captures patients' views on their health conditions and treatments: A qualitative study in the field of chronic pain.
    Zanini C; Maino P; Möller JC; Gobbi C; Raimondi M; Rubinelli S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 May; 99(5):747-53. PubMed ID: 26673108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The current status of surgical second opinion programs.
    Finkel ML; McCarthy EG; Ruchlin HS
    Surg Clin North Am; 1982 Aug; 62(4):705-19. PubMed ID: 6810482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second surgical opinion programs: dead or alive?
    McSherry CK; Chen PJ; Worner TM; Kupferstein N; McCarthy EG
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Nov; 185(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 9358088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consultation and referral process. A report from NEON. Northeastern Ohio Network Research Group.
    Bourguet C; Gilchrist V; McCord G
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Jan; 46(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9451370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.
    Tates K; Antheunis ML; Kanters S; Nieboer TE; Gerritse MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e421. PubMed ID: 29263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interruptions during consultations--harmful to both patients and physicians].
    Urkin J; Elhayany A; Ben-Hemo P; Abdelgani A
    Harefuah; 2002 Apr; 141(4):349-52, 410, 409. PubMed ID: 12017888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing and testing a measure of consultation-based reassurance for people with low back pain in primary care: a cross-sectional study.
    Holt N; Pincus T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jul; 17():277. PubMed ID: 27405870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors that influence cancer patients' and relatives' anxiety following a three-person medical consultation: impact of a communication skills training program for physicians.
    Lienard A; Merckaert I; Libert Y; Delvaux N; Marchal S; Boniver J; Etienne AM; Klastersky J; Reynaert C; Scalliet P; Slachmuylder JL; Razavi D
    Psychooncology; 2008 May; 17(5):488-96. PubMed ID: 17879970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doctor-patient communication: a comparison between telemedicine consultation and face-to-face consultation.
    Liu X; Sawada Y; Takizawa T; Sato H; Sato M; Sakamoto H; Utsugi T; Sato K; Sumino H; Okamura S; Sakamaki T
    Intern Med; 2007; 46(5):227-32. PubMed ID: 17329917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consultations in general practice: a comparison of patients' and doctors' satisfaction.
    Rashid A; Forman W; Jagger C; Mann R
    BMJ; 1989 Oct; 299(6706):1015-6. PubMed ID: 2511945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behind closed doors II: systematic analysis of prostate cancer patients' primary treatment consultations with radiation oncologists and predictors of satisfaction with communication.
    Hack TF; Ruether JD; Pickles T; Bultz BD; Chateau D; Degner LF
    Psychooncology; 2012 Aug; 21(8):809-17. PubMed ID: 21557385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.