310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27250829)
1. Laparoscopic wrap round mesh sacrohysteropexy for the management of apical prolapse.
Kupelian AS; Vashisht A; Sambandan N; Cutner A
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1889-1897. PubMed ID: 27250829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 1- to 4-year follow-up of women postoperatively.
Rahmanou P; White B; Price N; Jackson S
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jan; 25(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 24193261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive evaluation of anterior elevate system for the treatment of anterior and apical pelvic floor descent: 2-year followup.
Rapp DE; King AB; Rowe B; Wolters JP
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 23973517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic single sheet mesh sacrohysteropexy.
Pandeva I; Mistry M; Fayyad A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar; 36(3):787-793. PubMed ID: 27224927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study.
Izett-Kay ML; Aldabeeb D; Kupelian AS; Cartwright R; Cutner AS; Jackson S; Price N; Vashisht A
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Dec; 31(12):2595-2602. PubMed ID: 32620978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trocar-guided trans-vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: effects on urinary continence and anatomical and functional outcomes. A prospective observational study.
Natale F; Costantini E; La Penna C; Illiano E; Balsamo R; Carbone A; Cervigni M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Mar; 210():29-34. PubMed ID: 27930942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh.
Dubuisson J; Eperon I; Dällenbach P; Dubuisson JB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23001368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterus-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a patient-centred outcome report and video of a continuous series of 245 patients.
Veit-Rubin N; Dubuisson JB; Lange S; Eperon I; Dubuisson J
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):491-3. PubMed ID: 26476819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go?
Wong V; Guzman Rojas R; Shek KL; Chou D; Moore KH; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 26877210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term safety and efficacy of laparoscopically placed mesh for apical prolapse.
Nightingale G; Phillips C
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):871-877. PubMed ID: 32524157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.
Heinonen P; Aaltonen R; Joronen K; Ala-Nissilä S
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 26837782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes and complications of trans-vaginal mesh repair using the Prolift™ kit for pelvic organ prolapse at 4 years median follow-up in a tertiary referral centre.
Khan ZA; Thomas L; Emery SJ
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1151-7. PubMed ID: 24981047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse.
Paek J; Lee M; Kim BW; Kwon Y
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 26514118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term follow-up and quality of life after robot assisted sacrohysteropexy.
Grimminck K; Mourik SL; Tjin-Asjoe F; Martens J; Aktas M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():27-31. PubMed ID: 27614268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
