174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27250841)
1. Predisposing factors for adverse skin reactions with percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices implanted with skin reduction techniques.
Candreia C; Birrer R; Fistarol S; Kompis M; Caversaccio M; Arnold A; Stieger C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4185-4192. PubMed ID: 27250841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective analysis of skin complications related to bone-anchored hearing aid implant: association with surgical technique, quality of life, and audiological benefit.
Peñaranda D; Garcia JM; Aparicio ML; Montes F; Barón C; Jiménez RC; Peñaranda A
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2018; 84(3):324-331. PubMed ID: 28506614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.
Dumon T; Medina M; Sperling NM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in older adults: implant loss and skin reactions.
de Wolf MJ; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2009 Jul; 118(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 19708493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in children younger than 5 years of age.
Amonoo-Kuofi K; Kelly A; Neeff M; Brown CR
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 25680294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?
Strijbos RM; den Besten CA; Mylanus EA; Hol MK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3713-3722. PubMed ID: 27086360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.
Strijbos RM; Bom SJH; Zwerver S; Hol MKS
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 274(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 27439945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.
van der Stee EHH; Strijbos RM; Bom SJH; Hol MKS
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 29846791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone-anchored hearing aid implant location in relation to skin reactions.
Faber HT; de Wolf MJ; de Rooy JW; Hol MK; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Aug; 135(8):742-7. PubMed ID: 19687391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone-anchored hearing implant loading at 3 weeks: stability and tolerability after 6 months.
Faber HT; Dun CA; Nelissen RC; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Hol MK
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 23202148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conversion of traditional osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing aids to the Baha
Cedars E; Chan D; Lao A; Hardies L; Meyer A; Rosbe K
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():37-42. PubMed ID: 27863639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue overgrowth in bone-anchored hearing aid patients: use of 8.5 mm abutment.
Pelosi S; Chandrasekhar SS
J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Jun; 125(6):576-9. PubMed ID: 21457592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft tissue reactions in patients with bone anchored hearing aids.
Rebol J
Ir J Med Sci; 2015 Jun; 184(2):487-91. PubMed ID: 24913737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA dermatome.
Stalfors J; Tjellström A
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1109-14. PubMed ID: 18758391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A five-year follow-up on the osseointegration of bone-anchored hearing device implantation without tissue reduction.
Hultcrantz M; Lanis A
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1480-5. PubMed ID: 24770406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardization of the Punch Technique for the Implantation of Bone Anchored Auditory Devices: Evaluation of the MIPS Surgical Set.
Kim HHS; Kari E; Copeland BJ; Moore GF; Shaia WT; Cosetti MK; Wazen JJ; Wanna GB; Chang CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jul; 40(6):e631-e635. PubMed ID: 31157720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-week loading of the 4.5mm wide titanium implant in bone anchored hearing systems.
Wazen JJ; Babu S; Daugherty J; Metrailer A
Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 26954868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High body mass index as a risk factor for skin overgrowth with the bone-anchored hearing aid.
Berenholz LP; Burkey JM; Lippy WH
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):430-2. PubMed ID: 20084043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of bone-anchored hearing implant surgery in children: A systematic review.
Kruyt IJ; Bakkum KHE; Caspers CJI; Hol MKS
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109906. PubMed ID: 32028192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone anchored hearing implants without skin thinning: the Gruppo Otologico surgical and audiological experience.
Caruso A; Giannuzzi AL; Sozzi V; Sanna M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 274(2):695-700. PubMed ID: 27637751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
