These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27251122)

  • 1. Partial genotyping at polymorphic markers can improve heritability estimates in sibling groups.
    Gauzere J; Oddou-Muratorio S; Gay L; Klein EK
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Nov; 16(6):1340-1352. PubMed ID: 27251122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations: a comparison of pedigree and genomic approaches.
    Bérénos C; Ellis PA; Pilkington JG; Pemberton JM
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3434-51. PubMed ID: 24917482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RAD-sequencing for estimating genomic relatedness matrix-based heritability in the wild: A case study in roe deer.
    Gervais L; Perrier C; Bernard M; Merlet J; Pemberton JM; Pujol B; Quéméré E
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 31058463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. swinger: a user-friendly computer program to establish captive breeding groups that minimize relatedness without pedigree information.
    Sandoval-Castillo J; Attard CR; Marri S; Brauer CJ; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 27754599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular and pedigree measures of relatedness provide similar estimates of inbreeding depression in a bottlenecked population.
    Townsend SM; Jamieson IG
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 23496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of parasite transmission in promoting inbreeding: II. Pedigree reconstruction reveals sib-transmission and consequent kin-mating.
    Detwiler JT; Criscione CD
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Sep; 26(17):4405-4417. PubMed ID: 28626973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pedigree-free estimates of heritability in the wild: promising prospects for selfing populations.
    Gay L; Siol M; Ronfort J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66983. PubMed ID: 23825602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multilocus heterozygosity, parental relatedness and individual fitness components in a wild mountain goat, Oreamnos americanus population.
    Mainguy J; Côté SD; Coltman DW
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(10):2297-306. PubMed ID: 19389162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pedigree error due to extra-pair reproduction substantially biases estimates of inbreeding depression.
    Reid JM; Keller LF; Marr AB; Nietlisbach P; Sardell RJ; Arcese P
    Evolution; 2014 Mar; 68(3):802-15. PubMed ID: 24171712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship type affects the reliability of dispersal distance estimated using pedigree inferences in partially sampled populations: A case study involving invasive American mink in Scotland.
    Melero Y; Oliver MK; Lambin X
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Aug; 26(15):4059-4071. PubMed ID: 28437587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?
    Tonsor SJ; Goodnight CJ
    Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 28565103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular assessment of mating strategies in a population of Atlantic spotted dolphins.
    Green ML; Herzing DL; Baldwin JD
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118227. PubMed ID: 25692972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing direct and indirect selfing rate estimates: when are population-structure estimates reliable?
    Bürkli A; Sieber N; Seppälä K; Jokela J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Jun; 118(6):525-533. PubMed ID: 28177324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-Step BLUP with Varying Genotyping Effort in Open-Pollinated
    Ratcliffe B; El-Dien OG; Cappa EP; Porth I; Klápště J; Chen C; El-Kassaby YA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Mar; 7(3):935-942. PubMed ID: 28122953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population genetics of autopolyploids under a mixed mating model and the estimation of selfing rate.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 25981126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic variation, relatedness, and effective population size of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the southern Beaufort Sea, Alaska.
    Cronin MA; Amstrup SC; Talbot SL; Sage GK; Amstrup KS
    J Hered; 2009; 100(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 19633212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heritability Estimates of Antler and Body Traits in White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) From Genomic-Relatedness Matrices.
    Jamieson A; Anderson SJ; Fuller J; Côté SD; Northrup JM; Shafer ABA
    J Hered; 2020 Sep; 111(5):429-435. PubMed ID: 32692835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.