These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27251549)

  • 21. RNA secondary structure prediction based on free energy and phylogenetic analysis.
    Juan V; Wilson C
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jun; 289(4):935-47. PubMed ID: 10369773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Energy-directed RNA structure prediction.
    Hofacker IL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():71-84. PubMed ID: 24639155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pair stochastic tree adjoining grammars for aligning and predicting pseudoknot RNA structures.
    Matsui H; Sato K; Sakakibara Y
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2004; ():290-9. PubMed ID: 16448022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical modeling of RNA structure profiling experiments enables parsimonious reconstruction of structure landscapes.
    Li H; Aviran S
    Nat Commun; 2018 Feb; 9(1):606. PubMed ID: 29426922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bridging the gap in RNA structure prediction.
    Shapiro BA; Yingling YG; Kasprzak W; Bindewald E
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2007 Apr; 17(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17383172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Complete probabilistic analysis of RNA shapes.
    Voss B; Giegerich R; Rehmsmeier M
    BMC Biol; 2006 Feb; 4():5. PubMed ID: 16480488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. SCFGs in RNA secondary structure prediction RNA secondary structure prediction: a hands-on approach.
    Sükösd Z; Andersen ES; Lyngsø R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():143-62. PubMed ID: 24639159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A semi-supervised learning approach for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Yonemoto H; Asai K; Hamada M
    Comput Biol Chem; 2015 Aug; 57():72-9. PubMed ID: 25748534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficient parameter estimation for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Andronescu M; Condon A; Hoos HH; Mathews DH; Murphy KP
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i19-28. PubMed ID: 17646296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An RNA secondary structure prediction method based on minimum and suboptimal free energy structures.
    Fu H; Yang L; Zhang X
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Sep; 380():473-9. PubMed ID: 26100179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consensus folding of unaligned RNA sequences revisited.
    Bafna V; Tang H; Zhang S
    J Comput Biol; 2006 Mar; 13(2):283-95. PubMed ID: 16597240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. IPANEMAP: integrative probing analysis of nucleic acids empowered by multiple accessibility profiles.
    Saaidi A; Allouche D; Regnier M; Sargueil B; Ponty Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Sep; 48(15):8276-8289. PubMed ID: 32735675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Extracting information from RNA SHAPE data: Kalman filtering approach.
    Vaziri S; Koehl P; Aviran S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207029. PubMed ID: 30462682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fitness functions for RNA structure design.
    Ward M; Courtney E; Rivas E
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Apr; 51(7):e40. PubMed ID: 36869673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. RNA structure probing uncovers RNA structure-dependent biological functions.
    Wang XW; Liu CX; Chen LL; Zhang QC
    Nat Chem Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):755-766. PubMed ID: 34172967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Current perspectives on RNA secondary structure probing.
    Kenyon J; Prestwood L; Lever A
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2014 Aug; 42(4):1251-5. PubMed ID: 25110033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integration of accessibility data from structure probing into RNA-RNA interaction prediction.
    Miladi M; Montaseri S; Backofen R; Raden M
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Aug; 35(16):2862-2864. PubMed ID: 30590479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. RNA folding with hard and soft constraints.
    Lorenz R; Hofacker IL; Stadler PF
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2016; 11():8. PubMed ID: 27110276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.