These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2725260)

  • 1. On the relationship between categorical frequency estimation and cued recall.
    Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 2725260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inadequacy of recall as a basis for frequency knowledge.
    Watkins MJ; LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Nov; 17(6):1161-76. PubMed ID: 1838387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct and indirect tests of memory for category exemplars in young and older adults.
    Light LL; Albertson SA
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Dec; 4(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 2695121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two routes for activation in the priming of categorical coordinates.
    Ray S; Bly BM
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 18318409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explicit and implicit conceptual memory in pregnancy and postpartum: A cross-sectional study investigating the use of item-specific and relational encoding processes.
    Saraulli D; Zanetti H; Spataro P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 32496073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Encoding tasks dissociate the effects of divided attention on category-cued recall and category-exemplar generation.
    Parker A; Dagnall N; Munley G
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 22172981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Part-list cuing in speeded recognition and free recall.
    Oswald KM; Serra M; Krishna A
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 16933761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: a test of the outshining hypothesis.
    Cousins R; Hanley JR
    Memory; 1996 Jan; 4(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8821087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential contribution of left and right prefrontal cortex to associative cued-recall memory: a parametric PET study.
    Lepage M
    Neurosci Res; 2004 Mar; 48(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15154675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Part-set cuing effects in younger and older adults.
    Marsh EJ; Dolan PO; Balota DA; Roediger HL
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 15065937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of exemplar typicality and encoding strategies in category retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Migueles M; García-Bajos E
    Memory; 2014; 22(3):212-21. PubMed ID: 23473404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH; Grundgeiger T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 17352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can helping hurt? Effects of constraining and nonconstraining retrieval cue on list transfer by mentally retarded adolescents.
    Evans RA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1980 Nov; 85(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 7446600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Availability and category-frequency estimation.
    Bruce D; Hockley WE; Craik FI
    Mem Cognit; 1991 May; 19(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 1861616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Examination of relation among the generation effect, the level-of-processing effect, and the modality effect in explicit memory tasks].
    Okada K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1998 Apr; 69(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9691348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of midazolam on implicit and explicit memory in category exemplar production and category cued recall.
    Arndt J; Passannante A; Hirshman E
    Memory; 2004 Mar; 12(2):158-73. PubMed ID: 15250181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Preservation of Cued Recall in the Acute Mentally Fatigued State: A Randomised Crossover Study.
    Flindall IR; Leff DR; Pucks N; Sugden C; Darzi A
    World J Surg; 2016 Jan; 40(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 26578315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.