These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27252665)

  • 1. The Influence of Task-Irrelevant Flankers Depends on the Composition of Emotion Categories.
    Schulte Holthausen B; Regenbogen C; Turetsky BI; Schneider F; Habel U
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():712. PubMed ID: 27252665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corrigendum: The Influence of Task-Irrelevant Flankers Depends on the Composition of Emotion Categories.
    Schulte Holthausen B; Regenbogen C; Turetsky BI; Schneider F; Habel U
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1032. PubMed ID: 27445959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands.
    Aguado L; Martínez-García N; Solís-Olce A; Dieguez-Risco T; Hinojosa JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jun; 187():66-76. PubMed ID: 29751931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unveiling the influence of task-relevance of emotional faces on behavioral reactions in a multi-face context using a novel Flanker-Go/No-go task.
    Montalti M; Mirabella G
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20183. PubMed ID: 37978229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Attention Control on Implicit and Explicit Emotion Processing of Face and Body: Evidence From Flanker and Same-or-Different Paradigms.
    Oldrati V; Bardoni A; Poggi G; Urgesi C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2971. PubMed ID: 32038372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prolonged Interruption of Cognitive Control of Conflict Processing Over Human Faces by Task-Irrelevant Emotion Expression.
    Kim J; Kang MS; Cho YS; Lee SH
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1024. PubMed ID: 28676780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crowding with Negatively Conditioned Flankers and Targets.
    Pittino F; Eberhardt LV; Kurz A; Huckauf A
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2019; 15(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 32499838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angry and Fearful Face Conflict Effects in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.
    Ashley V; Swick D
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():136. PubMed ID: 30804838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.
    Barratt D; Bundesen C
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(7):1223-37. PubMed ID: 22416914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential modulation on neural activity related to flankers during face processing: A visual crowding study.
    Qiu Z; Wu D; Muehlebach BJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2023 Oct; 815():137496. PubMed ID: 37748673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Close - but not distant - conditioned flanker emotion affects crowding.
    Eberhardt LV; Pittino F; Huckauf A
    J Vis; 2021 Aug; 21(8):22. PubMed ID: 34424274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Influence of Anxiety on the Recognition of Facial Emotion Depends on the Emotion Category and Race of the Target Faces.
    Kang W; Kim G; Kim H; Lee SH
    Exp Neurobiol; 2019 Apr; 28(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 31138993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression.
    Dai Q; Feng Z
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 33(6):921-32. PubMed ID: 19394388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attending to emotional faces in the flanker task: Probably much less automatic than previously assumed.
    Tannert S; Rothermund K
    Emotion; 2020 Mar; 20(2):217-235. PubMed ID: 30550305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional bias during emotional processing: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an Emotional Flanker Task.
    Trujillo N; Gómez D; Trujillo S; López JD; Ibáñez A; Parra MA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249407. PubMed ID: 33798215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert Versus Overt Processing of Happy, Fearful and Sad Facial Expressions.
    Maffei A; Goertzen J; Jaspers-Fayer F; Kleffner K; Sessa P; Liotti M
    Brain Sci; 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34356176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential modulations of reward expectation on implicit facial emotion processing: ERP evidence.
    Wu L; Müller HJ; Zhou X; Wei P
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Mar; 56(3):e13304. PubMed ID: 30443953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing of face identity in the affective flanker task: a diffusion model analysis.
    Mueller CJ; Kuchinke L
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):963-973. PubMed ID: 26253324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proactive and reactive control depends on emotional valence: a Stroop study with emotional expressions and words.
    Kar BR; Srinivasan N; Nehabala Y; Nigam R
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):325-340. PubMed ID: 28393610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli.
    Bannerman RL; Hibbard PB; Chalmers K; Sahraie A
    Emotion; 2012 Dec; 12(6):1384-92. PubMed ID: 22775132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.