These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27252671)

  • 1. Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function.
    McMahon CM; Boisvert I; de Lissa P; Granger L; Ibrahim R; Lo CY; Miles K; Graham PL
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():745. PubMed ID: 27252671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise-A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study.
    Fiedler L; Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 33950865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Input-related demands: vocoded sentences evoke different pupillometrics and subjective listening effort than sentences in speech-shaped noise.
    Giuliani NP; Venkitakrishnan S; Wu YH
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Mar; 63(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 36519812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An exploratory Study of EEG Alpha Oscillation and Pupil Dilation in Hearing-Aid Users During Effortful listening to Continuous Speech.
    Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Wendt D; Alickovic E; Whitmer WM; Lunner T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235782. PubMed ID: 32649733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
    Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.
    Bönitz H; Lunner T; Finke M; Fiedler L; Lyxell B; Riis SK; Ng E; Valdes AL; Büchner A; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):846-859. PubMed ID: 33492008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.
    Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of simultaneously-obtained measures of listening effort: pupil dilation, verbal response time and self-rating.
    Visentin C; Valzolgher C; Pellegatti M; Potente P; Pavani F; Prodi N
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Jul; 61(7):561-573. PubMed ID: 34634214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Effortful Word Recognition on Supportive Neural Systems Measured by Alpha and Theta Power.
    Ryan DB; Eckert MA; Sellers EW; Schairer KS; McBee MT; Jones MR; Smith SL
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1549-1562. PubMed ID: 35363640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing Impairment: Reduced Pupil Dilation Response and Frontal Activation During Degraded Speech Perception.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Heslenfeld DJ; Versfeld NJ; Vriend C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Nov; 67(11):4549-4566. PubMed ID: 39392910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.