These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2725269)

  • 21. Auditory and temporal factors in the modality effect.
    Crowder RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 2939183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparisons of memory for nonverbal auditory and visual sequential stimuli.
    McFarland DJ; Cacace AT
    Psychol Res; 1995; 57(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 7708900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of recall procedures on the modality effect with numbers and enumerated stimuli.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AK; Partin KT
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 18318410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiple mechanisms for recency with vowels and consonants.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 2725270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The death of recency: Relationship between end-state comfort and serial position effects in serial recall: Logan and Fischman (2011) revisited.
    Logan SW; Fischman MG
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Dec; 44():11-21. PubMed ID: 26298213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beyond Recognition: Visual Contributions to Verbal Working Memory.
    Nittrouer S; Lowenstein JH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):253-273. PubMed ID: 34788554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Serial-position effects on a free-recall task in bilinguals.
    Yoo J; Kaushanskaya M
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):409-22. PubMed ID: 25730660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influences of delayed distraction on the modality effect in free recall.
    Gathercole SE; Gregg VH; Gardiner JM
    Br J Psychol; 1983 May; 74(Pt 2):223-32. PubMed ID: 6883013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Serial position effects in young children: temporal or spatial?
    Brown RM; Brown NL; Caci M
    Child Dev; 1981; 52(4):1191-201. PubMed ID: 7318520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall.
    Frick RW
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):551-62. PubMed ID: 2796740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. First things first: similar list length and output order effects for verbal and nonverbal stimuli.
    Cortis C; Dent K; Kennett S; Ward G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1179-214. PubMed ID: 25528092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: modality effects in order and frequency judgments.
    Glenberg AM; Fernandez A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):728-39. PubMed ID: 2972805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall.
    Harvey AJ; Beaman CP
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):693-700. PubMed ID: 17924278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A negative semantic similarity effect on short-term order memory: evidence from recency judgements.
    Tse CS
    Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):638-56. PubMed ID: 20687000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: evidence from suffix and strategy effects.
    Hu Y; Hitch GJ; Baddeley AD; Zhang M; Allen RJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1665-1678. PubMed ID: 24933616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recency effect in recall of a word list when an immediate memory task is performed after each word presentation.
    Watkins MJ; Neath I; Sechler ES
    Am J Psychol; 1989; 102(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2729453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC; Neely CB; Wilson JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Mar; 23(2):472-83. PubMed ID: 9080015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relationship between end-state comfort effects and memory performance in serial and free recall.
    Logan SW; Fischman MG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 21497330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The auditory recency advantage in longer term free recall is not enhanced by recalling prerecency items first.
    Gardiner JM; Gardiner MM; Gregg VH
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Nov; 11(6):616-20. PubMed ID: 6669030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.