These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2725272)

  • 1. The negative generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
    Schmidt SR; Cherry K
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):359-69. PubMed ID: 2725272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.
    Steffens MC; Erdfelder E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Nov; 51(4):705-33. PubMed ID: 9854440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1403-16. PubMed ID: 23421508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory.
    Clark SE
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):442-55. PubMed ID: 7666757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primacy and recency in primed free association and associative cued recall.
    Brooks BM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):479-85. PubMed ID: 12198787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?
    Lambert AM; Bodner GE; Taikh A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 27244358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parietal lesion effects on cued recall following pair associate learning.
    Ben-Zvi S; Soroker N; Levy DA
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 73():176-94. PubMed ID: 25998492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive memory: Animacy enhances free recall but impairs cued recall.
    Popp EY; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):186-201. PubMed ID: 26375781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-generation amplifies the errorless learning effect in healthy older adults when transfer appropriate processing conditions are met.
    Guild EB; Anderson ND
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):592-607. PubMed ID: 22247977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotionally enhanced memory for negatively arousing words: storage or retrieval advantage?
    Nadarevic L
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Dec; 31(8):1557-1570. PubMed ID: 27741932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.
    Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antimnemonic effects of schemas in young and older adults.
    Badham SP; Maylor EA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2016; 23(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 25980799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The generation effect extended: memory enhancement for generation cues.
    Greenwald AG; Johnson MM
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 2811664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct versus indirect tests of memory: directed forgetting meets the generation effect.
    MacLeod CM; Daniels KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 10909145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.