These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27252761)

  • 1. Accuracy of Implant Position Transfer and Surface Detail Reproduction with Different Impression Materials and Techniques.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Oct; 12(10):774-83. PubMed ID: 27252761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
    Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings in a multiple variable impression setup for recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions: An
    Kaur T; Singla S; Kumar L
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36588371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of complete-arch implant impression made with occlusal registration material.
    Papazoglou E; Wee AG; Carr AB; Urban I; Margaritis V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 31079882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Different Impression Techniques When Using the All-on-Four Implant Treatment Protocol.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Beyabanaki E; Rahimian S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 27148987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Study of Dimensional Accuracy in Three Dental Implant Impression Techniques: Open Tray, Closed Tray with Impression Coping, and Snap Cap.
    Izadi A; Heidari B; Roshanaei G; Allahbakhshi H; Fotovat F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):974-981. PubMed ID: 30150500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants.
    Nakhaei M; Madani AS; Moraditalab A; Haghi HR
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 26604956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of multiple use of impression copings on the accuracy of implant transfer.
    Alikhasi M; Bassir SH; Naini RB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 23527342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.
    Ebadian B; Rismanchian M; Dastgheib B; Bajoghli F
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 25878678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional accuracy of innovative implant-level impression techniques with plastic snap-on impression copings.
    Asli HN; Hemmati YB; Falahchai M
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):351-357. PubMed ID: 34435758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impression materials and trays on the accuracy of angulated implants impressions.
    Siadat H; Saeidi Z; Alikhasi M; Zeighami S
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Nov; 10(11):e1096-e1102. PubMed ID: 30607227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of implant impression precision: Different materials and techniques.
    Tabesh M; Alikhasi M; Siadat H
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e151-e157. PubMed ID: 29670733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the accuracy of open-tray and snap-on impression techniques of implants with different angulations.
    Tafti AF; Hatami M; Razavi F; Ebadian B
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2019; 16(6):413-420. PubMed ID: 31803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.