These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2725337)

  • 1. Endometrial sampling using the Mi Mark procedure as a primary routine: first year's experience.
    Uvebrant M; Bergström H; Hansson G; Mattsson LA
    Maturitas; 1989 Mar; 11(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 2725337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of endometrial sampling compared to conventional dilatation and curettage in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
    Abdelazim IA; Abdelrazak KM; Elbiaa AA; Al-Kadi M; Yehia AH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 May; 291(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 25367600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Endorette and dilatation and curettage for sampling of the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding.
    Epstein E; Skoog L; Valentin L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Oct; 80(10):959-64. PubMed ID: 11580743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endometrial biopsy using a plastic curette (Mi-Mark).
    Ansari AH; Essien JD; Hoffman D; Ansari VM
    Int J Fertil; 1981; 26(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 6113208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
    Rauf R; Shaheen A; Sadia S; Waqar F; Zafar S; Sultana S; Waseem S
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of the Mi-Mark endoemtrial sampling technique.
    Crow J; Gordon H; Hudson E
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jan; 33(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 7358859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endometrial sampling prior to hysterectomy.
    Stovall TG; Solomon SK; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):405-9. PubMed ID: 2915864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic reliability of Mi-Mark helix technique in endometrial neoplasia.
    Ginsberg NA; Padleckas R; Javaheri G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 6866365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of endometrial sampling with the Accurette and Vabra aspirator and uterine curettage.
    Goldberg GL; Tsalacopoulos G; Davey DA
    S Afr Med J; 1982 Jan; 61(4):114-6. PubMed ID: 7058425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of the Accurette endometrial sampler.
    Sonnendecker EW; Simon GB; Sevitz H; Hofmeyr GJ
    S Afr Med J; 1982 Jan; 61(4):109-13. PubMed ID: 7058424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vacuum curettage by the Vabrar method. A simple procedure for endometrial diagnosis.
    Einerth Y
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1982; 61(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 7148413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
    Sanam M; Majid MM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage in clinical practice: are factors affecting their effectiveness the same?
    Piatek S; Warzecha D; Kisielewski F; Szymusik I; Panek G; Wielgos M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):645-651. PubMed ID: 30548369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
    Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
    Kazandi M; Okmen F; Ergenoglu AM; Yeniel AO; Zeybek B; Zekioglu O; Ozdemir N
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance characteristics of the Indiana University Medical Center endometrial sampler (Tao Brush) in an outpatient office setting, first year's outcomes: recognizing histological patterns in cytology preparations of endometrial brushings.
    Maksem JA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Mar; 22(3):186-95. PubMed ID: 10680001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy.
    Liu H; Wang FL; Zhao YM; Yao YQ; Li YL
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 25549755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Kevorkian curette. An appraisal of its effectiveness in endometrial evaluation.
    Ferenczy A; Shore M; Guralnick M; Gelfand MM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Aug; 54(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 460766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma using the Mi-MarkR helix sampling technique.
    Linden M; Roger V
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1982; 61(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 6181649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.