104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27253508)
1. Colour imaging in the monitoring and documentation of choroidal naevi. Are Optomap colour images adequate for this purpose?
Paul Brett J; Lake A; Downes S
J Vis Commun Med; 2016; 39(1-2):10-7. PubMed ID: 27253508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of choroidal naevi using scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Gordon-Shaag A; Barnard S; Millodot M; Gantz L; Chiche G; Vanessa E; Ruth W; Pinchasov R; Gosman Z; Simchi M; Koslowe K; Shneor E
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Jan; 34(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 24325439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the Optomap with lid retraction and its sensitivity and specificity.
Cheng SC; Yap MK; Goldschmidt E; Swann PG; Ng LH; Lam CS
Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Jul; 91(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 18601667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating malignancy risk of melanocytic choroidal tumours detected in the Australian National Eye Health Survey.
Salehi O; van Wijngaarden P; Keel S; Foreman J; Dirani M; Damato B; O'Day R
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Nov; 104(8):854-858. PubMed ID: 33689655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. High-resolution ultrasound reflex transmission imaging and digital photography: potential tools for the quantitative assessment of pigmented lesions.
Rallan D; Dickson M; Bush NL; Harland CC; Mortimer P; Bamber JC
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 16420539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A new approach for studying the retinal and choroidal circulation].
Yoneya S
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 108(12):836-61; discussion 862. PubMed ID: 15656089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between a white LED confocal imaging system and a conventional flash fundus camera using chromaticity analysis.
Sarao V; Veritti D; Borrelli E; Sadda SVR; Poletti E; Lanzetta P
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):231. PubMed ID: 31744471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of peripheral extension, acquisition time, and image chromaticity of Optos, Clarus, and EIDON systems.
Fantaguzzi F; Servillo A; Sacconi R; Tombolini B; Bandello F; Querques G
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 36456861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new fundus camera technique to help calculate eye-camera magnification: a rapid means to measure disc size.
Quigley MG; Dube P
Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 121(5):707-9. PubMed ID: 12742849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Features of choroidal naevi on swept source optical coherence tomography angiography and structural reverse flow optical coherence tomography.
Ali ZC; Gray J; Balaskas K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 256(7):1319-1323. PubMed ID: 29520479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Glaucoma Screening in Nepal: Cup-to-Disc Estimate With Standard Mydriatic Fundus Camera Compared to Portable Nonmydriatic Camera.
Miller SE; Thapa S; Robin AL; Niziol LM; Ramulu PY; Woodward MA; Paudyal I; Pitha I; Kim TN; Newman-Casey PA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():99-106. PubMed ID: 28734816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Choroidal pigmented lesions imaged by ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy with two laser wavelengths (Optomap).
Kernt M; Schaller UC; Stumpf C; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
Clin Ophthalmol; 2010 Jul; 4():829-36. PubMed ID: 20689737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultra-wide-field imaging for cytomegalovirus retinitis.
Mudvari SS; Virasch VV; Singa RM; MacCumber MW
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 20507014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of Optos Panoramic 200MA imaging for the monitoring of large suspicious choroidal lesions.
Jain A; Shah SP; Tsui I; McCannel TA
Semin Ophthalmol; 2009; 24(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 19241293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical verification of the formula of Bennett et al. (1994) of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography.
Knaapi L; Aarnisalo E; Vesti E; Leinonen MT
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 93(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 25270771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Joslin Vision Network Validation Study: pilot image stabilization phase.
Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Cavallerano J; Gardner WK; Strong J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1998 Nov; 69(11):699-710. PubMed ID: 9844322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of stereoscopic digital imaging and slide film photography in the identification of macular degeneration.
Somani R; Tennant M; Rudnisky C; Weis E; Ting A; Eppler J; Greve M; Hinz B; de Leon A
Can J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 40(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15947799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-wide field imaging system and traditional retinal examinations for screening fundus changes after cataract surgery.
Peng J; Zhang Q; Jin HY; Lu WY; Zhao PQ
Int J Ophthalmol; 2016; 9(9):1299-303. PubMed ID: 27672595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
