105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27253508)
21. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Autofluorescence imaging in age-related macular degeneration complicated by choroidal neovascularization: a prospective study.
Vaclavik V; Vujosevic S; Dandekar SS; Bunce C; Peto T; Bird AC
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):342-6. PubMed ID: 17599415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. OPTOMAP WIDEFIELD IMAGING OF THE ARGUS II RETINAL PROSTHESIS IN PATIENTS WITH RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA.
Israelsen PE; Sadda SR; Dorn JD; Humayun MS; Olmos de Koo LC
Retin Cases Brief Rep; 2016; 10(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 26705237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of colour micrographs obtained with a charged couple device (CCD) camera and a 35-mm camera.
Pedersen MM; Smedegaard J; Jensen PK; Heegaard S; Jensen OA; Prause JU
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 15715564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
Rasmussen ML; Broe R; Frydkjaer-Olsen U; Olsen BS; Mortensen HB; Peto T; Grauslund J
J Diabetes Complications; 2015; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25240716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Naevus of the choroid.
Oosterhuis JA; von Winning CH
Ophthalmologica; 1979; 178(3):156-65. PubMed ID: 471433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Telemedicine screening of retinal diseases with a handheld portable non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Jin K; Lu H; Su Z; Cheng C; Ye J; Qian D
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):89. PubMed ID: 28610611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inter-observer agreement and sensitivity of Optomap images for screening peripheral retinal lesions in patients undergoing refractive surgery.
Venkatesh R; Cherry JP; Reddy NG; Anilkumar A; Sridharan A; Sangai S; Shetty R; Yadav NK; Jayadev C
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 68(12):2930-2934. PubMed ID: 33229672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of two non-mydriatic fundus cameras to obtain retinal arterio-venous ratio.
Jürgens C; Ittermann T; Völzke H; Tost F
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 25119116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Heritability of naevus patterns in an adult twin cohort from the Brisbane Twin Registry: a cross-sectional study.
Lee S; Duffy DL; McClenahan P; Lee KJ; McEniery E; Burke B; Jagirdar K; Martin NG; Sturm RA; Soyer HP; Schaider H
Br J Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 174(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 26871925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Static vessel analysis in nonmydriatic and mydriatic images].
Nagel E; Vilser W; Fink A; Riemer T
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 May; 224(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 17516371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Colour fidelity: the camera never lies - or does it?
Hodson TM; Donnell CC
Br Dent J; 2020 Oct; 229(8):547-550. PubMed ID: 33097892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Non-mydriatic single-field fundus photography for the screening of retinal diseases in an executive health clinic.
Tarabishy AB; Campbell JP; Misra-Hebert A; Seballos RJ; Lang RS; Singh RP
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 21410106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optos Optomap Panoramic 200MA imaging of a serous choroidal detachment responsive to furosemide.
Shah SP; Jain A; Tsui I; McCannel TA
Semin Ophthalmol; 2009; 24(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19241292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility of the Digital Retinography System Camera in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Ivan Y; Ramgopal S; Cardenas-Villa M; Winger DG; Wang L; Vitale MA; Saladino RA
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2018 Jul; 34(7):488-491. PubMed ID: 28609333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
