105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27253508)
41. Central serous chorioretinopathy fundus autofluorescence comparison with two different confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopes.
Nam KT; Yun CM; Kim JT; Yang KS; Kim HJ; Kim SW; Oh J; Huh K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 253(12):2121-7. PubMed ID: 25690981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Indicators for the total number of melanocytic naevi: an adjunct for screening campaigns. Observational study on 292 patients.
Echeverría B; Bulliard JL; Guillén C; Nagore E
Br J Dermatol; 2014 Jan; 170(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 24443914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Reflectance of human skin using colour photometric stereo: with particular application to pigmented lesion analysis.
Sun J; Smith M; Smith L; Coutts L; Dabis R; Harland C; Bamber J
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 18412559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Utility of 1% Tropicamide in Improving the Quality of Images for Tele-Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Dark Irides.
Banaee T; Ansari-Astaneh MR; Pourreza H; Faal Hosseini F; Vatanparast M; Shoeibi N; Jami V
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 24(4):217-221. PubMed ID: 28658588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Digital photography and blurred image processing of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma].
Xu L; Chen Y; Yang H
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Nov; 36(6):410-2, 26. PubMed ID: 11853637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Outpatient Ultra wide-field intravenous fundus fluorescein angiography in infants using the Optos P200MA scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Fung TH; Yusuf IH; Smith LM; Brett J; Weston L; Patel CK
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 98(3):302-4. PubMed ID: 24338087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The quality of photographs produced by the non-mydriatic fundus camera in a screening programme for diabetic retinopathy: a 1 year prospective study.
Heaven CJ; Cansfield J; Shaw KM
Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 6)():787-90. PubMed ID: 8119435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a rural French population with a mobile non-mydriatic camera.
Beynat J; Charles A; Astruc K; Metral P; Chirpaz L; Bron AM; Creuzot-Garcher C
Diabetes Metab; 2009 Feb; 35(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19097818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The role of digital fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening. Digital Diabetic Screening Group (DDSG).
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 11484714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Measurement of size of pigmented choroidal nevus: Superiority of multicolor imaging compared to conventional color fundus photography.
Saurabh K; Roy R; Sinharoy S; Shah D; Nangia P
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 66(10):1501-1503. PubMed ID: 30249854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Posterior Segment Distortion in Ultra-Widefield Imaging Compared to Conventional Modalities.
Nicholson L; Goh LY; Marshall E; Vazquez-Alfageme C; Chatziralli I; Clemo M; Hykin PG; Sivaprasad S
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina; 2016 Jul; 47(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 27434896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography.
Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T
Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Quality and learning curve of handheld versus stand-alone non-mydriatic cameras.
Gosheva M; Klameth C; Norrenberg L; Clin L; Dietter J; Haq W; Ivanov IV; Ziemssen F; Leitritz MA
Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():1601-1606. PubMed ID: 28919703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The effect of image colour distortion on evaluation of donor liver suitability for transplantation.
de Cunha DA; Eadie LH; Barbur JL; Hawkes DJ; Seifalian AM
Comput Biol Med; 2004 Oct; 34(7):615-32. PubMed ID: 15369712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Detection and monitoring of sickle cell retinopathy using ultra wide-field color photography and fluorescein angiography.
Cho M; Kiss S
Retina; 2011 Apr; 31(4):738-47. PubMed ID: 21836403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The retinal disease screening study: retrospective comparison of nonmydriatic fundus photography and three-dimensional optical coherence tomography for detection of retinal irregularities.
Ouyang Y; Heussen FM; Keane PA; Sadda SR; Walsh AC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 54(8):5694-700. PubMed ID: 23847317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The stars within the melanocytic garden: unusual variants of Spitz naevi.
Moscarella E; Al Jalbout S; Piana S; Argenziano G; Lallas A; Longo C; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Zalaudek I
Br J Dermatol; 2015 Apr; 172(4):1045-51. PubMed ID: 25123161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Risk factors for the degeneration of the choroid naevi: a retrospective study of 135 cases].
Desjardins L; Lumbroso L; Levy C; Plancher C; Asselain B
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2001 Jun; 24(6):610-6. PubMed ID: 11460057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
