These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27253621)

  • 1. Attentional cueing induces false memory.
    Miyoshi K; Ashida H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Jul; 43():66-74. PubMed ID: 27253621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking.
    Westerman DL; Lanska M; Olds JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):426-38. PubMed ID: 25528088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments.
    McCabe DP; Geraci LD
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 19344688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The schema provokes a disparity of false recollection between actions and objects in an everyday scene.
    Yamada R; Itsukushima Y
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Aug; 54(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 23672299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of the familiarity difference cue in inferential judgments.
    Xu P; González-Vallejo C; Weinhardt J; Chimeli J; Karadogan F
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):298-314. PubMed ID: 29067637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of cue familiarity during retrieval failure is affected by past versus future orientation.
    Cleary AM
    Memory; 2015; 23(4):590-601. PubMed ID: 24786966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.
    Wais PE; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 18004949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluent, fast, and frugal? A formal model evaluation of the interplay between memory, fluency, and comparative judgments.
    Hilbig BE; Erdfelder E; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):827-39. PubMed ID: 21355665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human recognition memory and conflict control: An event-related potential study.
    Liu T; Liu X; Xiao T; Shi J
    Neuroscience; 2016 Jan; 313():83-91. PubMed ID: 26633266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The temporal dynamics of perceptual and conceptual fluency on recognition memory.
    Wang W; Li B; Gao C; Guo C
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Nov; 127():1-12. PubMed ID: 30176534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias in self-motion perceived speed can enhance episodic memory.
    Cerles M; Rousset S
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S121-4. PubMed ID: 22806647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias-free double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: performance enhancement from voluntary and involuntary attention.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():204-12. PubMed ID: 25159288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.