These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27253702)

  • 41. The tort liability of the psychiatrist.
    Fishalow SE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(4):191-230. PubMed ID: 1234518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Medical malpractice and hernia repair: an analysis of case law.
    Walters AL; Dacey KT; Zemlyak AY; Lincourt AE; Heniford BT
    J Surg Res; 2013 Apr; 180(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 22578855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The case that has psychiatrists running scared: Ahmed v. Stefaniu.
    Glancy DR; Glancy GD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 19535564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Medicolegal analysis of injury during endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Lynn-Macrae AG; Lynn-Macrae RA; Emani J; Kern RC; Conley DB
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1492-5. PubMed ID: 15280732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Medication associated with hearing loss: 25 years of medical malpractice cases in the United States.
    Ruhl DS; Cable BB; Martell DW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Sep; 151(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 24894421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influencing factors leading to malpractice litigation in radical prostatectomy.
    Colaco M; Sandberg J; Badlani G
    J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1770-5. PubMed ID: 24333245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessing Adverse Outcomes and Learning Needs in Canadian Psychiatric Independent Medical Examinations.
    Booth BD; Waldman JC; Fortier JH; Garber G; Hardy K; Lemay K; Liu R; Tomita TM; Ramshaw LAL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2024 Mar; 52(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 38467444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Medical malpractice litigation in gastroenterological practice in Japan: a 22-yr review of civil court cases.
    Sasao S; Hiyama T; Tanaka S; Mukai S; Yoshihara M; Chayama K
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 101(9):1951-3. PubMed ID: 16968500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Urological medical malpractice.
    Kahan SE; Goldman HB; Marengo S; Resnick MI
    J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1638-42. PubMed ID: 11342944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Malpractice Litigation and Testicular Torsion: A Legal Database Review.
    Colaco M; Heavner M; Sunaryo P; Terlecki R
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 49(6):849-54. PubMed ID: 26409673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Solving the medical malpractice crisis: use a clear and convincing evidence standard.
    Engel E; Livingston EH
    Arch Surg; 2010 Mar; 145(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 20231632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Patterns and trends among physicians-in-training named in civil legal cases: a retrospective analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association data from 1993 to 2017.
    McDougall A; Zhang C; Yang Q; Taylor T; Neilson HK; Nuth J; Tsai E; Lee S; Lefebvre G; Calder LA
    CMAJ Open; 2022; 10(3):E781-E788. PubMed ID: 36100273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.
    Brown TW; McCarthy ML; Kelen GD; Levy F
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 May; 17(5):553-60. PubMed ID: 20536812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of Nondisclosure Agreements in Medical Malpractice Settlements by a Large Academic Health Care System.
    Sage WM; Jablonski JS; Thomas EJ
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Jul; 175(7):1130-5. PubMed ID: 25961829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychiatric malpractice: a review of the national loss experience.
    Slawson PF; Guggenheim FG
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Aug; 141(8):979-81. PubMed ID: 6465375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Do you understand your risk? Liability and third-party evaluations in civil litigation.
    Gold LH; Davidson JE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 17592166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Learning from an analysis of closed malpractice litigation involving myocardial infarction.
    Wu KH; Yen YL; Wu CH; Hwang CY; Cheng SY
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 May; 48():41-45. PubMed ID: 28441614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Estimation of medical protocol correctness in the light of opinions issued as ordered by the judiciary or prosecution authorities].
    Pieśniak D; Jankowski Z; Raszeja S
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Jul; 23(133):47-51. PubMed ID: 18051829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery.
    Eloy JA; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Couldwell WT; Liu JK
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 120(1):185-90. PubMed ID: 24074492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.