200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27255244)
1. Comparative analysis of optical biometers.
Sabatino F; Findl O; Maurino V
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 May; 42(5):685-93. PubMed ID: 27255244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers.
Sabatino F; Matarazzo F; Findl O; Maurino V
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1124-1129. PubMed ID: 31174987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems.
Calvo-Sanz JA; Portero-Benito A; Arias-Puente A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):559-566. PubMed ID: 29392397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of 2 biometers using swept-source OCT technology.
Panthier C; Rouger H; Gozlan Y; Moran S; Gatinel D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 34034291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry.
Huang J; Chen H; Li Y; Chen Z; Gao R; Yu J; Zhao Y; Lu W; McAlinden C; Wang Q
J Refract Surg; 2019 Feb; 35(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 30742226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability of new optical biometer and agreement with 2 validated optical biometers, all based on SS-OCT.
Galzignato A; Lupardi E; Hoffer KJ; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 49(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 36026703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.
Cho YJ; Lim TH; Choi KY; Cho BJ
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):257-264. PubMed ID: 30091303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates With Biometers Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Compared to Partial-Coherence Interferometry and Optical Low-Coherence Interferometry.
McAlinden C; Wang Q; Gao R; Zhao W; Yu A; Li Y; Guo Y; Huang J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 173():64-69. PubMed ID: 27664702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement of ocular biometry measurements between 2 biometers.
Yeu E
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 31279621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry.
Tu R; Yu J; Savini G; Ye J; Ning R; Xiong J; Chen S; Huang J
J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-465. PubMed ID: 32644168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of AL-Scan and IOLMaster 500 Partial Coherence Interferometry Optical Biometers.
Hoffer KJ; Savini G
J Refract Surg; 2016 Oct; 32(10):694-698. PubMed ID: 27722757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
