These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27255312)

  • 41. Neurotoxic and hepatotoxic cyanotoxins removal by nanofiltration.
    Teixeira MR; Rosa MJ
    Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(15):2837-46. PubMed ID: 16839584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Natural organic matter fouling behaviors on superwetting nanofiltration membranes.
    Shan L; Fan H; Guo H; Ji S; Zhang G
    Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():121-132. PubMed ID: 26900973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Capillary nanofiltration coupled with powdered activated carbon adsorption for high quality water reuse.
    Kazner C; Meier J; Wintgens T; Melin T
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(1):251-9. PubMed ID: 19587422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The role of ozonation and activated carbon filtration in the natural organic matter removal from drinking water.
    Matilainen A; Iivari P; Sallanko J; Heiska E; Tuhkanen T
    Environ Technol; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1171-80. PubMed ID: 17144266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Removal of the cyanotoxin anatoxin-a by drinking water treatment processes: a review.
    Vlad S; Anderson WB; Peldszus S; Huck PM
    J Water Health; 2014 Dec; 12(4):601-17. PubMed ID: 25473970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes.
    Uyak V; Koyuncu I; Oktem I; Cakmakci M; Toroz I
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):789-94. PubMed ID: 17768007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Structure changes and water filtration properties of electrospun polyamide nanofibre membranes.
    Daels N; Harinck L; Goethals A; De Clerck K; Van Hulle SW
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(8):1920-6. PubMed ID: 27120647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of treatment efficiency of submerged nanofiltration membrane bioreactors using cellulose triacetate and polyamide membrane.
    Choi JH; Fukushi K; Yamamoto K
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):305-12. PubMed ID: 16003990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Modelling of arsenic (III) removal from aqueous solution using film theory combined Spiegler-Kedem model: pilot-scale study.
    Rajendran RM; Garg S; Bajpai S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):13886-13899. PubMed ID: 33205270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Arsenic remediation from drinking water using Fenton's reagent with slow sand filter.
    Jasudkar D; Rakhunde R; Deshpande L; Labhasetwar P; Juneja HD
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 89(6):1231-4. PubMed ID: 23052589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative performance of flat sheet and spiral wound modules in the nanofiltration of reactive dye solution.
    Patel TM; Chheda H; Baheti A; Patel P; Nath K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Aug; 19(7):2994-3004. PubMed ID: 22351259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Nanofiltration processes applied to the removal of phenyl-ureas in natural waters.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Real FJ; García C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jun; 165(1-3):714-23. PubMed ID: 19054613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Nanofiltration and granular activated carbon treatment of perfluoroalkyl acids.
    Appleman TD; Dickenson ER; Bellona C; Higgins CP
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():740-6. PubMed ID: 23846124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide.
    Coronell O; Mi B; Mariñas BJ; Cahill DG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Natural organic matter and sulphate elimination from rainwater with nanofiltration technology and process optimisation using response surface methodology.
    Köse-Mutlu B
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 83(3):580-594. PubMed ID: 33600363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Degradation of Polyamide Nanofiltration Membranes by Bromine: Changes of Physiochemical Properties and Filtration Performance.
    Zhao H; Yang L; Chen X; Sheng M; Cao G; Cai L; Meng S; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(9):6329-6339. PubMed ID: 33848140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Arsenic removal from drinking water by a household sand filter in Vietnam--effect of filter usage practices on arsenic removal efficiency and microbiological water quality.
    Nitzsche KS; Lan VM; Trang PT; Viet PH; Berg M; Voegelin A; Planer-Friedrich B; Zahoransky J; Müller SK; Byrne JM; Schröder C; Behrens S; Kappler A
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jan; 502():526-36. PubMed ID: 25300017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
    Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Recovery of sulfuric acid aqueous solution from copper-refining sulfuric acid wastewater using nanofiltration membrane process.
    Yun T; Chung JW; Kwak SY
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():652-657. PubMed ID: 29975892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. In vitro bioanalysis of drinking water from source to tap.
    Rosenmai AK; Lundqvist J; le Godec T; Ohlsson Å; Tröger R; Hellman B; Oskarsson A
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():272-280. PubMed ID: 29656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.