468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27255738)
1. Compositional data analysis of the microbiome: fundamentals, tools, and challenges.
Tsilimigras MC; Fodor AA
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 May; 26(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 27255738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CCLasso: correlation inference for compositional data through Lasso.
Fang H; Huang C; Zhao H; Deng M
Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3172-80. PubMed ID: 26048598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. It's all relative: analyzing microbiome data as compositions.
Gloor GB; Wu JR; Pawlowsky-Glahn V; Egozcue JJ
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 May; 26(5):322-9. PubMed ID: 27143475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis and correction of compositional bias in sparse sequencing count data.
Kumar MS; Slud EV; Okrah K; Hicks SC; Hannenhalli S; Corrada Bravo H
BMC Genomics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):799. PubMed ID: 30400812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental metagenomics and ribosomal profiling of the human skin microbiome.
Ferretti P; Farina S; Cristofolini M; Girolomoni G; Tett A; Segata N
Exp Dermatol; 2017 Mar; 26(3):211-219. PubMed ID: 27623553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MixMC: A Multivariate Statistical Framework to Gain Insight into Microbial Communities.
Lê Cao KA; Costello ME; Lakis VA; Bartolo F; Chua XY; Brazeilles R; Rondeau P
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160169. PubMed ID: 27513472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks.
Kurtz ZD; Müller CL; Miraldi ER; Littman DR; Blaser MJ; Bonneau RA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004226. PubMed ID: 25950956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Large-scale benchmarking reveals false discoveries and count transformation sensitivity in 16S rRNA gene amplicon data analysis methods used in microbiome studies.
Thorsen J; Brejnrod A; Mortensen M; Rasmussen MA; Stokholm J; Al-Soud WA; Sørensen S; Bisgaard H; Waage J
Microbiome; 2016 Nov; 4(1):62. PubMed ID: 27884206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inference of Environmental Factor-Microbe and Microbe-Microbe Associations from Metagenomic Data Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Statistical Model.
Yang Y; Chen N; Chen T
Cell Syst; 2017 Jan; 4(1):129-137.e5. PubMed ID: 28125788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal probabilistic modeling of bacterial compositions derived from 16S rRNA sequencing.
Äijö T; Müller CL; Bonneau R
Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(3):372-380. PubMed ID: 28968799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling.
Jian C; Luukkonen P; Yki-Järvinen H; Salonen A; Korpela K
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227285. PubMed ID: 31940382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. gCoda: Conditional Dependence Network Inference for Compositional Data.
Fang H; Huang C; Zhao H; Deng M
J Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 28489411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. gmcoda: Graphical model for multiple compositional vectors in microbiome studies.
Fang H
Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 39(11):. PubMed ID: 37975866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analyses of Intestinal Microbiota: Culture versus Sequencing.
Hiergeist A; Gläsner J; Reischl U; Gessner A
ILAR J; 2015; 56(2):228-40. PubMed ID: 26323632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Advanced technologies for the human gut microbiome analysis].
Hattori M
Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi; 2014; 37(5):412-22. PubMed ID: 25744641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to Count Our Microbes? The Effect of Different Quantitative Microbiome Profiling Approaches.
Galazzo G; van Best N; Benedikter BJ; Janssen K; Bervoets L; Driessen C; Oomen M; Lucchesi M; van Eijck PH; Becker HEF; Hornef MW; Savelkoul PH; Stassen FRM; Wolffs PF; Penders J
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():403. PubMed ID: 32850498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A fast and robust protocol for metataxonomic analysis using RNAseq data.
Cox JW; Ballweg RA; Taft DH; Velayutham P; Haslam DB; Porollo A
Microbiome; 2017 Jan; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 28103917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
