339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27255874)
1. Intubation Performance of Advanced Airway Devices in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Setting.
Hafner JW; Perkins BW; Korosac JD; Bucher AK; Aldag JC; Cox KL
Air Med J; 2016; 35(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 27255874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Airway Management in Disaster Response: A Manikin Study Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Prehospital Providers in Level C Personal Protective Equipment.
Yousif S; Machan JT; Alaska Y; Suner S
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Aug; 32(4):352-356. PubMed ID: 28318455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope in helicopter emergency medical services: a pilot trial.
Russi CS; Myers LA; Kolb LJ; Goodman BW; Berns KS
Air Med J; 2013; 32(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 23452367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes using a rigid neck collar in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy.
Ali QE; Das B; Amir SH; Siddiqui OA; Jamil S
J Clin Anesth; 2014 May; 26(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 24809787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope.
Murphy LD; Kovacs GJ; Reardon PM; Law JA
J Emerg Med; 2014 Aug; 47(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24742495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variables associated with successful intubation attempts using video laryngoscopy: a preliminary report in a helicopter emergency medical service.
Carlson JN; Quintero J; Guyette FX; Callaway CW; Menegazzi JJ
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 22191806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq(®) NT, McGrath(®) MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin.
Gómez-Ríos MÁ; Pinegger S; de Carrillo Mantilla M; Vizcaino L; Barreto-Calvo P; Paech MJ; Gómez-Ríos D; López-Calviño B
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 27108827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Bullard and Airtraq laryngoscopes with conventional laryngoscopy in a manikin study of simulated difficult intubation.
Legrand MA; Steinmann D; Priebe HJ; Mols G
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Jul; 29(7):343-50. PubMed ID: 22569030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the GlideScope Ranger Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in the Prehospital Setting: A Randomized Control Trial.
Trimmel H; Kreutziger J; Fitzka R; Szüts S; Derdak C; Koch E; Erwied B; Voelckel WG
Crit Care Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):e470-6. PubMed ID: 27002277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of success rates between two video laryngoscope systems used in a prehospital clinical trial.
Burnett AM; Frascone RJ; Wewerka SS; Kealey SE; Evens ZN; Griffith KR; Salzman JG
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24400965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study.
Castillo-Monzón CG; Marroquín-Valz HA; Fernández-Villacañas-Marín M; Moreno-Cascales M; García-Rojo B; Candia-Arana CA
J Clin Anesth; 2017 Feb; 36():136-141. PubMed ID: 28183552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Airtraq video laryngoscope as a rescue device after difficult direct laryngoscopy.
Iglesias González JL; Gómez-Ríos MA; Poveda Marina JL; Calvo-Vecino JM
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2018 Dec; 65(10):552-557. PubMed ID: 30177221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope During Pediatric Intubation Performed by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study With Three Airway Scenarios.
Szarpak Ł; Karczewska K; Czyżewski Ł; Truszewski Z; Kurowski A
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2017 Nov; 33(11):735-739. PubMed ID: 27228145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can the new McGrath laryngoscope rival the GlideScope Ranger portable video laryngoscope? A randomized manikin study.
Kim W; Choi HJ; Lim T; Kang BS
Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Oct; 32(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 25171799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model.
Hodnick R; Zitek T; Galster K; Johnson S; Bledsoe B; Ebbs D
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Dec; 32(6):621-624. PubMed ID: 28807073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients.
Alvis BD; Hester D; Watson D; Higgins M; St Jacques P
Minerva Anestesiol; 2016 Jan; 82(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 25881731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
