These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27256095)

  • 1. Clinical excellence: evidence on the assessment of senior doctors' applications to the UK Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards. Analysis of complete national data set.
    Campbell JL; Abel G
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jun; 6(6):e011958. PubMed ID: 27256095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A national analysis of the medical schools of training for merit award-winning laboratory medical doctors working in Britain.
    Steele S; Andrade G
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 23(1):222. PubMed ID: 37029376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing doctors' competencies using multisource feedback: validating a Japanese version of the Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT).
    Sasaki H; Archer J; Yonemoto N; Mori R; Nishida T; Kusuda S; Nakayama T
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e007135. PubMed ID: 26078310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
    Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of consultants who hold distinction awards in England and Wales: database analysis with particular reference to sex and ethnicity.
    Lambert TW; Goldacre MJ; Vallance E; Mallick N
    BMJ; 2004 Jun; 328(7452):1347. PubMed ID: 15090443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Realizing One's Own Subjectivity: Assessors' Perceptions of the Influence of Training on Their Conduct of Workplace-Based Assessments.
    Hodwitz K; Kuper A; Brydges R
    Acad Med; 2019 Dec; 94(12):1970-1979. PubMed ID: 31397710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seeing the same thing differently: mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly-observed performance assessments.
    Yeates P; O'Neill P; Mann K; Eva K
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):325-41. PubMed ID: 22581567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consultation competence in general practice: testing the reliability of the Leicester assessment package.
    Fraser RC; McKinley RK; Mulholland H
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):293-6. PubMed ID: 8068374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting graduates for the interns' award by using multisource feedback process: does it work?
    Strachan K; Otoom S; Al-Gallaf A; Al Ansari A
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Oct; 10(1):527. PubMed ID: 29084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK?
    Archer J; Norcini J; Southgate L; Heard S; Davies H
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 17036157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinician and simulated patient scoring - the psychometrics of a national programme recruiting dentists to DF1 training posts.
    Wiskin CM; Elley K; Jones E; Duffy J
    Br Dent J; 2013 Aug; 215(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 23928607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. My thoughts on teaching.
    Smith BJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 19861711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Award for Excellence in Perioperative Nursing--AORN's ultimate prize.
    Voss SJ
    AORN J; 1992 Dec; 56(6):1085-7. PubMed ID: 1463328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 May; 95(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 20457700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Postgrad Med J; 2010 Sep; 86(1019):526-31. PubMed ID: 20841329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnet recognition--excellence is the standard.
    Hader R
    Nurs Manage; 2010 Jun; 41(6):6. PubMed ID: 20511999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom.
    Wilkinson JR; Crossley JG; Wragg A; Mills P; Cowan G; Wade W
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 18338989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the academic performance of psychiatrists influence success in the NHS Clinical Excellence Award Scheme?
    Mitchell AJ; Crowfoot D; Leaver J; Hughes S
    JRSM Short Rep; 2011 Mar; 2(3):21. PubMed ID: 21541089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.