These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27256136)

  • 1. Genomic Test Results and the Courtroom: The Roles of Experts and Expert Testimony.
    Ramos E; Callier SL; Swann PB; Harvey HH
    J Law Med Ethics; 2016 Mar; 44(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 27256136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP; Cecil JS
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence.
    Marlowe DB
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):207-28. PubMed ID: 10150377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
    Cecil JS
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
    Krauss DA; Scurich N
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expert witness testimony: rules of engagement.
    Satiani B
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2006; 40(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 16703210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the witness stand: learning the courtroom tango.
    Dalby JT
    Can Fam Physician; 2007 Jan; 53(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17872611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) and expert testimony.
    Kulich R; Maciewicz R; Scrivani SJ
    Pain Med; 2009 Mar; 10(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 19254335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic gatekeepers: regulating direct-to-consumer genomic services in an era of participatory medicine.
    Palmer JE
    Food Drug Law J; 2012; 67(4):475-524, iii. PubMed ID: 24640618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine.
    Newson AJ; Leonard SJ; Hall A; Gaff CL
    BMC Med Genomics; 2016 Sep; 9(1):57. PubMed ID: 27586379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating next-generation sequencing into pediatric oncology practice: An assessment of physician confidence and understanding of clinical genomics.
    Johnson LM; Valdez JM; Quinn EA; Sykes AD; McGee RB; Nuccio R; Hines-Dowell SJ; Baker JN; Kesserwan C; Nichols KE; Mandrell BN
    Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(12):2352-2359. PubMed ID: 28192596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender and the experience of mental health expert witness testimony.
    Kaempf AC; Baxter P; Packer IK; Pinals DA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 25770280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
    Hollingsworth JG; Lasker EG
    J Health Law; 2004; 37(1):85-111. PubMed ID: 15191237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mental state at time of offense in the hot tub: An empirical examination of concurrent expert testimony in an insanity case.
    Krauss DA; Gongola J; Scurich N; Busch B
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):358-372. PubMed ID: 29691882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A scientist's take on scientific evidence in the courtroom.
    Albright TD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301839120. PubMed ID: 37782801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A nationwide questionnaire survey of medical experts in mental health evaluation].
    Koike J; Morita N; Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19301591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.