74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27256365)
1. Comparing audiological test results obtained from a sound processor attached to a Softband with direct and magnetic passive bone conduction hearing implant systems.
Kara A; Iseri M; Durgut M; Topdag M; Ozturk M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4193-4198. PubMed ID: 27256365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Baha SoundArc in children.
Moyer C; Purdy J; Carvalho D; Vaughan L; Shroyer L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 179():111925. PubMed ID: 38552429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective estimation of frequency-specific pure-tone hearing thresholds following bone-conduction hearing aid stimulation.
Rahne T; Ehelebe T
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():247942. PubMed ID: 24977186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of a Novel, Nonsurgical Bone-Conduction Hearing Aid for the Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss in Australian Children.
Marino R; Eager K; Kuthubutheen J; Kadhim L; Távora-Vieira D
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Oct; 44(9):853-859. PubMed ID: 37621119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Precise selection of bone conduction hearing devices for congenital malformation of the middle and outer ear (CMMOE).
Zou Y; Wang Q; Liu C; Ren L; Sun X; Yang S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 143(sup1):S49-S53. PubMed ID: 38141167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing.
Kruyt IJ; Nelissen RC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):609-615. PubMed ID: 29561377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early Results With the New Active Bone-Conduction Hearing Implant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lein A; Baumgartner WD; Riss D; Gstöttner W; Landegger LD; Liu DT; Thurner T; Vyskocil E; Brkic FF
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jun; 170(6):1630-1647. PubMed ID: 38529662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Active Bone Conduction Implant and Adhesive Bone Conduction Device: A Comparison of Audiological Performance and Subjective Satisfaction.
Di Gregorio MF; Der C; Bravo-Torres S; Zernotti ME
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 28(2):e332-e338. PubMed ID: 38618604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten years' experience with bone conduction hearing aids in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Kuschke S; Rogers C; Meyer E
S Afr J Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 70(1):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 36744472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prediction of speech understanding with the transcutaneous partially implantable bone conduction hearing system Osia®. German Version].
Arndt S; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Speck I; Hocke T; Jakob TF; Rauch AK
HNO; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37589726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Power output and hearing performance in osseointegrated auditory devices.
Calvo-Gómez J; Pla-Gil I; Latorre Monteagudo E; Pitarch Ribas MI; Marco Algarra J
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2021 May; ():. PubMed ID: 34082922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone Conduction Threshold Measurements in Patients with Bone Conduction Devices: A Comparison of Available Methods.
Wróbel MJ; Gibasiewicz R; Pietraszek M; Kluczyński Ł; Gawęcki W
J Int Adv Otol; 2023 Jul; 19(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 37528593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulator Verification Is Potentially Beneficial for the Fitting of Softband Bone Conduction Hearing Devices in Young Children.
Sun L; Ping L; Fan X; Wang J; Chen X
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38924037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Auditory Osseointegrated Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
den Besten CA; Stalfors J; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn M; Eeg-Olofsson M; Aggarwal R; Green K; Nelissen RC; Mylanus EA; Hol MK
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1077-83. PubMed ID: 27482783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Percutaneous Abutments for Bone Conduction Hearing Devices.
Breen JT; Nader ME; Gidley PW
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):e224-e228. PubMed ID: 34889825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective verification of audibility in bone conduction devices.
Persson AC; Håkansson B; Fredén Jansson KJ; Reinfeldt S; Eeg-Olofsson M
Int J Audiol; 2024 Apr; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38602203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic Review of the Audiological Efficacy of Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aids and the Factors Influencing Their Clinical Application.
Li B; Lee S; Cao Z; Koike T; Joseph R; Brown TH; Zhao F
Audiol Res; 2023 Aug; 13(4):636-650. PubMed ID: 37622931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Provision of bone conduction hearing implants in England in adults and children: a review of Hospital Episode Statistics data 2012-2021.
Conybeare A; Bennett L; Osborne MS
J Laryngol Otol; 2024 Jun; 138(6):621-626. PubMed ID: 38456642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Multinational Cost-Consequence Analysis of a Bone Conduction Hearing Implant System-A Randomized Trial of a Conventional vs. a Less Invasive Treatment With New Abutment Technology.
van Hoof M; Wigren S; Ivarsson Blechert J; Molin M; Andersson H; Mateijsen DJM; Bom SJH; Calmels MN; van der Rijt AJM; Flynn MC; van Tongeren J; Hof JR; Brunings JW; Anteunis LJC; Marco Algarra J; Stokroos RJ; Joore MA
Front Neurol; 2020; 11():106. PubMed ID: 32231633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
