These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27256365)

  • 1. Comparing audiological test results obtained from a sound processor attached to a Softband with direct and magnetic passive bone conduction hearing implant systems.
    Kara A; Iseri M; Durgut M; Topdag M; Ozturk M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4193-4198. PubMed ID: 27256365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
    den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparative Study of a Novel Adhesive Bone Conduction Device and Conventional Treatment Options for Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Skarzynski PH; Ratuszniak A; Osinska K; Koziel M; Krol B; Cywka KB; Skarzynski H
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):858-864. PubMed ID: 31295197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of the Osia™ system, a new active osseointegrated implant system. Results from a prospective clinical investigation.
    Goycoolea M; Ribalta G; Tocornal F; Levy R; Alarcón P; Bryman M; Cagnacci B; Catenacci C; Oyanguren V; Vilches I; Briones V; García R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 140(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 32068449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation.
    Briggs R; Van Hasselt A; Luntz M; Goycoolea M; Wigren S; Weber P; Smeds H; Flynn M; Cowan R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):834-41. PubMed ID: 25634465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing improvement with softband and implanted bone-anchored hearing devices and modified implantation surgery in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia.
    Wang Y; Fan X; Wang P; Fan Y; Chen X
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():120-125. PubMed ID: 29287851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing Benefit and Rated Satisfaction in Children with Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss Using a Transcutaneous Magnetic-Coupled Bone-Conduction Hearing Aid.
    Polonenko MJ; Carinci L; Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Cushing SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016; 27(10):790-804. PubMed ID: 27885975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.
    Alzhrani F
    Saudi Med J; 2019 Aug; 40(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 31423516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing Outcomes with Percutaneous and Transcutaneous BAHA® Technology in Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss.
    Tobia A; Yehudai N; Khnifes R; Shpak T; Roth O; Khayr R; Luntz M
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Oct; 42(9):1382-1389. PubMed ID: 34528924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative headband assessment for semi-implantable bone conduction hearing devices in conductive hearing loss: is it useful or misleading?
    Rainsbury JW; Williams BA; Gulliver M; Morris DP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 25548890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Baha SoundArc in children.
    Moyer C; Purdy J; Carvalho D; Vaughan L; Shroyer L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 179():111925. PubMed ID: 38552429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of traditional bone-conduction hearing AIDS with the Baha system.
    Christensen L; Smith-Olinde L; Kimberlain J; Richter GT; Dornhoffer JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 20388452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained with Baha preoperative assessment tools and those obtained with the osseointegrated implant.
    Heywood RL; Patel PM; Jonathan DA
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2011 May; 90(5):E21-7. PubMed ID: 21563076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal Choice for Improving the Hearing in Children with Unilateral Microtia and Atresia: Softband or Adhesive Adapter?
    Liu Y; Chen P; Yang L; Zhu J; Yang J; Wang D; Ren R; Li Y; Zhao C; Zhao S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 36316005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone Conduction Amplification in Children: Stimulation via a Percutaneous Abutment versus a Transcutaneous Softband.
    Pittman AL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 30870242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Gerdes T; Salcher RB; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 27093021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individualised headband simulation test for predicting outcome after percutaneous bone conductive implantation.
    Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Biagini M; Lazzarino AI; Barbara M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2015 Oct; 35(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 26824212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of implant stability and auditory pure-tone thresholds of Baha patients comparing osteosysthesis and osseointegrated systems.
    Rahne T; Götze G; Pein MK
    Z Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 25(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25063386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative Benefit of Bone Anchored Hearing Systems: Behavioral Performance and Self-Reported Outcomes.
    Cuda D; Murri A; Mochi P; Mainardi A
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 26(3):e314-e320. PubMed ID: 35846807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of audiologic results and patient satisfaction for two osseointegrated bone conduction devices: results of a prospective study.
    Busch S; Giere T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):842-8. PubMed ID: 25730448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.