These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27256562)
1. Consumers' practical understanding of healthy food choices: a fake food experiment. Mötteli S; Keller C; Siegrist M; Barbey J; Bucher T Br J Nutr; 2016 Aug; 116(3):559-66. PubMed ID: 27256562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The fake food buffet - a new method in nutrition behaviour research. Bucher T; van der Horst K; Siegrist M Br J Nutr; 2012 May; 107(10):1553-60. PubMed ID: 21920063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shrinking the food-print: A qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Hoek AC; Pearson D; James SW; Lawrence MA; Friel S Appetite; 2017 Jan; 108():117-131. PubMed ID: 27686818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Food choices in the presence of 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' eating partners. Robinson E; Higgs S Br J Nutr; 2013 Feb; 109(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 22647276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a Nutrient Rich Foods consumer education program: results from the nutrition advice study. Glanz K; Hersey J; Cates S; Muth M; Creel D; Nicholls J; Fulgoni V; Zaripheh S J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Jan; 112(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 22717177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is healthy food? Objective nutrient profile scores and subjective lay evaluations in comparison. Bucher T; Müller B; Siegrist M Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():408-14. PubMed ID: 26256557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do hedonic- versus nutrition-based attitudes toward food predict food choices? a cross-sectional study of 6- to 11-year-olds. Marty L; Miguet M; Bournez M; Nicklaus S; Chambaron S; Monnery-Patris S Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Nov; 14(1):162. PubMed ID: 29178916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The importance of taste on dietary choice, behaviour and intake in a group of young adults. Kourouniotis S; Keast RSJ; Riddell LJ; Lacy K; Thorpe MG; Cicerale S Appetite; 2016 Aug; 103():1-7. PubMed ID: 26972352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fruit for dessert. How people compose healthier meals. Bucher T; van der Horst K; Siegrist M Appetite; 2013 Jan; 60(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 23085475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Healthy eating decisions require efficient dietary self-control in children: A mouse-tracking food decision study. Ha OR; Bruce AS; Pruitt SW; Cherry JB; Smith TR; Burkart D; Bruce JM; Lim SL Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():575-81. PubMed ID: 27349708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. I Eat Healthier Than You: Differences in Healthy and Unhealthy Food Choices for Oneself and for Others. Sproesser G; Kohlbrenner V; Schupp H; Renner B Nutrients; 2015 Jun; 7(6):4638-60. PubMed ID: 26066013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced-Sodium Lunches Are Well-Accepted by Uninformed Consumers Over a 3-Week Period and Result in Decreased Daily Dietary Sodium Intakes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Janssen AM; Kremer S; van Stipriaan WL; Noort MW; de Vries JH; Temme EH J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Oct; 115(10):1614-25. PubMed ID: 25769746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors of adults concerning nonalcoholic beverages suggest some lack of comprehension related to sugars. Rampersaud GC; Kim H; Gao Z; House LA Nutr Res; 2014 Feb; 34(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 24461314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of olfactory and auditory priming on the attraction to foods with high energy density. Chambaron S; Chisin Q; Chabanet C; Issanchou S; Brand G Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():74-80. PubMed ID: 26119807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nutrition behavior of the middle-aged and elderly: Compliance with dietary recommendations of the food pyramid. Gille D; Bütikofer U; Chollet M; Schmid A; Altintzoglou T; Honkanen P; Stoffers H; Walther B; Piccinali P Clin Nutr; 2016 Jun; 35(3):638-44. PubMed ID: 25931172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consumers' responses to front-of-pack labels that vary by interpretive content. Talati Z; Pettigrew S; Kelly B; Ball K; Dixon H; Shilton T Appetite; 2016 Jun; 101():205-13. PubMed ID: 26970293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential problems with increasing serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts label. Dallas SK; Liu PJ; Ubel PA Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():577-84. PubMed ID: 26278876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Back-of-pack information in substitutive food choices: A process-tracking study in participants intending to eat healthy. van Buul VJ; Bolman CAW; Brouns FJPH; Lechner L Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():173-183. PubMed ID: 28472643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Food Rating Scale in Food Services: From Development to Assessment of a Strategy for Consumer Healthier Choices. Mazocco L; Akutsu RCCA; Botelho RBA; Da Silva ICR; Adjafre R; Zandonadi RP Nutrients; 2018 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 30223477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]