These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals]. Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection? Enserink M Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The misused impact factor. Simons K Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Review criteria for research manuscripts. Bordage G; Caelleigh AS; Steinecke A; Bland CJ; Crandall SJ; McGaghie WC; Pangaro LN; Penn G; Regehr G; Shea JS; Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):897-978. PubMed ID: 11565558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators. Tipton CM Physiologist; 1991 Oct; 34(5):275, 278-9. PubMed ID: 1788353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: relevance for research in clinical neuropsychology. Cicchetti DV; Rourke BP; Wass P J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1992 Nov; 14(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 1452641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica]. Loría A; Lisker R Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]