These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27256964)

  • 21. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Fitzgerald MB; Shapiro WH; McDonald PD; Neuburger HS; Ashburn-Reed S; Immerman S; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 17453457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Evaluation of an electrode design for the combined electric-acoustic stimulation].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Radeloff A; Lehnert T; Gstöttner W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Oct; 83(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design on Post-Op Speech Perception.
    Pennington-FitzGerald W; Waring NA; Hamiter M; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39369438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation.
    Smullen JL; Polak M; Hodges AV; Payne SB; King JE; Telischi FF; Balkany TJ
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):977-82. PubMed ID: 15933504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dispersed Hydrogel Actuator for Modiolar Hugging Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.
    Stieghorst J; Doll T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Nov; 63(11):2294-2300. PubMed ID: 26863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of Neural Interface When Using Modiolar Electrode Stimulation. Radiological Evaluation, Trans-Impedance Matrix Analysis and Effect on Listening Effort in Cochlear Implantation.
    Ramos-de-Miguel A; Falcón-González JC; Ramos-Macias A
    J Clin Med; 2021 Aug; 10(17):. PubMed ID: 34501410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fabrication and evaluation of an improved polymer-based cochlear electrode array for atraumatic insertion.
    Gwon TM; Min KS; Kim JH; Oh SH; Lee HS; Park MH; Kim SJ
    Biomed Microdevices; 2015 Apr; 17(2):32. PubMed ID: 25681972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in long-term deafened cats.
    George SS; Wise AK; Fallon JB; Shepherd RK
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Jun; 12(3):036003. PubMed ID: 25834113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
    Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea.
    Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ; Dekker DM; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2014 Sep; 315():10-24. PubMed ID: 24975087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the Relationship between the NRT-Ratio, Cochlear Anatomy, and Insertions Depth of Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
    Mittmann P; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Hassepass F; Ernst A; Todt I
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():706253. PubMed ID: 26839885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Close-field electroporation gene delivery using the cochlear implant electrode array enhances the bionic ear.
    Pinyon JL; Tadros SF; Froud KE; Y Wong AC; Tompson IT; Crawford EN; Ko M; Morris R; Klugmann M; Housley GD
    Sci Transl Med; 2014 Apr; 6(233):233ra54. PubMed ID: 24760189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
    Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Lane JI; Driscoll CL
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cochlear implant candidacy and surgical considerations.
    Cohen NL
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 15205547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multi-rigid-body modeling and simulation of perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays.
    Zhu R; Li J; Wang Z; Wu Y; Wang B; Zhao K
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 May; 233(5):483-496. PubMed ID: 30895876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.