254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27257328)
1. 'Peer review' for scientific manuscripts: Emerging issues, potential threats, and possible remedies.
Das AK
Med J Armed Forces India; 2016 Apr; 72(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 27257328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emerging trends in peer review-a survey.
Walker R; Rocha da Silva P
Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():169. PubMed ID: 26074753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals.
Candal-Pedreira C; Rey-Brandariz J; Varela-Lema L; Pérez-Ríos M; Ruano-Ravina A
An Pediatr (Engl Ed); 2023 Jul; 99(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 37349245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical journal peer review: process and bias.
Manchikanti L; Kaye AD; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):E1-E14. PubMed ID: 25675064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply.
Jolly PD
N Z Vet J; 2003 Aug; 51(4):199. PubMed ID: 16032326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):293-321. PubMed ID: 28905258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
Enquselassie F
Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating, Improving, and Appreciating Peer Review at
Kennedy AB
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork; 2021 Mar; 14(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 33654500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles].
Shashok K
Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1946-50. PubMed ID: 9528039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.
Polak JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 7645496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.
Almquist M; von Allmen RS; Carradice D; Oosterling SJ; McFarlane K; Wijnhoven B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179031. PubMed ID: 28662046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.
Benson PJ
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Oct; 97(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 26414359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review of the biomedical literature.
Olson CM
Am J Emerg Med; 1990 Jul; 8(4):356-8. PubMed ID: 2194471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
Cejas C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.
Kelly J; Sadeghieh T; Adeli K
EJIFCC; 2014 Oct; 25(3):227-43. PubMed ID: 27683470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review.
Parmanne P; Laajava J; Järvinen N; Harju T; Marttunen M; Saloheimo P
Res Integr Peer Rev; 2023 Oct; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 37876004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication.
Kovanis M; Trinquart L; Ravaud P; Porcher R
Scientometrics; 2017; 113(1):651-671. PubMed ID: 29056795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
Bayne SC; McGivney GP; Mazer SC
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
