These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27258030)

  • 1. Kidney-Sparing Methods for Extended-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (EF-IMRT) in Cervical Carcinoma Treatment.
    Kunogi H; Yamaguchi N; Terao Y; Sasai K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156623. PubMed ID: 27258030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetric predictors of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving extended-field radiation therapy for gynecologic cancer.
    Kunogi H; Yamaguchi N; Terao Y; Sasai K
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Feb; 16(1):25. PubMed ID: 33541379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
    Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric comparison of combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy versus IMRT alone for pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies.
    Milby AB; Both S; Ingram M; Lin LL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e477-84. PubMed ID: 22177626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
    Deng X; Han C; Chen S; Xie C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Deng Z; Jin X
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duodenal and other gastrointestinal toxicity in cervical and endometrial cancer treated with extended-field intensity modulated radiation therapy to paraaortic lymph nodes.
    Poorvu PD; Sadow CA; Townamchai K; Damato AL; Viswanathan AN
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Apr; 85(5):1262-8. PubMed ID: 23182395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
    Mell LK; Tiryaki H; Ahn KH; Mundt AJ; Roeske JC; Aydogan B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18640499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Dosimetric comparaison between VMAT and tomotherapy with para-aortic irradiation for cervix carcinoma].
    Renard-Oldrini S; Guinement L; Salleron J; Brunaud C; Huger S; Grandgirard N; Villani N; Marchesi V; Oldrini G; Peiffert D
    Cancer Radiother; 2015 Dec; 19(8):733-8. PubMed ID: 26547380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dosimetric study of postoperative 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and coplanar decile intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer].
    Jiang J; Zhang L; Liao S; Huagn R
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Aug; 32(8):1201-5. PubMed ID: 22931623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetric comparison of doses to organs at risk using 3-D conformal radiotherapy versus intensity modulated radiotherapy in postoperative radiotherapy of periampullary cancers: implications for radiation dose escalation.
    Bahl A; Kapoor R; Tomar P; Singh OA; Gupta R; Sharma SC
    JOP; 2013 Jan; 14(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 23306333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk.
    Ahmed RS; Kim RY; Duan J; Meleth S; De Los Santos JF; Fiveash JB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 15380585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative planning study of step-and-shoot IMRT versus helical tomotherapy for whole-pelvis irradiation in cervical cancer.
    Chitapanarux I; Tharavichitkul E; Nobnop W; Wanwilairat S; Vongtama R; Traisathit P
    J Radiat Res; 2015 May; 56(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 25720771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application value of reduced field intensity modulated radiation therapy for advanced cervical cancer].
    DU XL; Sheng XG; Wang C; Yu H; Song QQ; Pan CX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 35(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24506963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
    Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
    Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Wang-Chesebro A; Xia P; Coleman J; Akazawa C; Roach M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 17011444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces small bowel, rectum, and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and para-aortic irradiation.
    Portelance L; Chao KS; Grigsby PW; Bennet H; Low D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Sep; 51(1):261-6. PubMed ID: 11516876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric comparison of vaginal vault ovoid brachytherapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans in postoperative patients of cervical carcinoma following whole pelvic radiotherapy.
    Khosla D; Patel FD; Oinam AS; Tomar P; Sharma SC
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 24762503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus para-aortic field radiotherapy to treat para-aortic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer: prospective study.
    Du XL; Sheng XG; Jiang T; Yu H; Yan YF; Gao R; Lu CH; Li QS
    Croat Med J; 2010 Jun; 51(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 20564766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whole-pelvic radiotherapy with spot-scanning proton beams for uterine cervical cancer: a planning study.
    Hashimoto S; Shibamoto Y; Iwata H; Ogino H; Shibata H; Toshito T; Sugie C; Mizoe JE
    J Radiat Res; 2016 Sep; 57(5):524-532. PubMed ID: 27380800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Feng CH; Hasan Y; Kopec M; Al-Hallaq HA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):76-89. PubMed ID: 27685108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.