119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27258119)
1. Prediction of Pathological Stage in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Neuro-Fuzzy Model.
Cosma G; Acampora G; Brown D; Rees RC; Khan M; Pockley AG
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155856. PubMed ID: 27258119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Eur Urol; 2004 Nov; 46(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 15474265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial neural network for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in a Taiwanese population.
Tsao CW; Liu CY; Cha TL; Wu ST; Sun GH; Yu DS; Chen HI; Chang SY; Chen SC; Hsu CY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Oct; 77(10):513-8. PubMed ID: 25175002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Total PSA, PSA density and biopsy Gleason score in predicting the pathologic stage of prostate cancer].
Liu S; Lü JJ; Fu Q; Zhang H; Gao DX; Liu Z
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 May; 16(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 20684321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Counseling men with prostate cancer: a nomogram for predicting the presence of small, moderately differentiated, confined tumors.
Kattan MW; Eastham JA; Wheeler TM; Maru N; Scardino PT; Erbersdobler A; Graefen M; Huland H; Koh H; Shariat S; Slawin KM; Ohori M
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1792-7. PubMed ID: 14532778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of neural networks and logistic regression analysis for predicting pathological stage in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population based study.
Borque A; Sanz G; Allepuz C; Plaza L; Gil P; Rioja LA
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1672-8. PubMed ID: 11586200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].
Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neuro-fuzzy system for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Benecchi L
Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):357-61. PubMed ID: 16904452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multigene methylation analysis for detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Enokida H; Shiina H; Urakami S; Igawa M; Ogishima T; Li LC; Kawahara M; Nakagawa M; Kane CJ; Carroll PR; Dahiya R
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Sep; 11(18):6582-8. PubMed ID: 16166436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prospective validation of a nomogram predictive of a positive initial prostate biopsy].
Ramírez-Backhaus M; Bahilo P; Arlandis S; Santamaría Navarro C; Pontones Moreno JL; Jiménez-Cruz F
Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 20223131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
