181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27258385)
1. Bias in Research Grant Evaluation Has Dire Consequences for Small Universities.
Murray DL; Morris D; Lavoie C; Leavitt PR; MacIsaac H; Masson ME; Villard MA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155876. PubMed ID: 27258385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.
Gordon R; Poulin BJ
Account Res; 2009; 16(1):13-40. PubMed ID: 19247851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty.
Waisbren SE; Bowles H; Hasan T; Zou KH; Emans SJ; Goldberg C; Gould S; Levine D; Lieberman E; Loeken M; Longtine J; Nadelson C; Patenaude AF; Quinn D; Randolph AG; Solet JM; Ullrich N; Walensky R; Weitzman P; Christou H
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008 Mar; 17(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indeed: Cost of the NSERC science grant peer review system exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.
Gordon R; Poulin BJ
Account Res; 2009 Jul; 16(4):232-3. PubMed ID: 20183164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions.
Gross K; Bergstrom CT
PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000065. PubMed ID: 30601806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.
van der Lee R; Ellemers N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(40):12349-53. PubMed ID: 26392544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency.
Witteman HO; Hendricks M; Straus S; Tannenbaum C
Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):531-540. PubMed ID: 30739688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Science and agriculture policy at Land-Grant Institutions.
Westendorf ML; Zimbelman RG; Pray CE
J Anim Sci; 1995 Jun; 73(6):1628-38. PubMed ID: 7673056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An output evaluation of a health research foundation's enhanced grant review process for new investigators.
Hammond GW; Lê ML; Novotny T; Caligiuri SPB; Pierce GN; Wade J
Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Jun; 15(1):57. PubMed ID: 28629438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Science budget: funding by numbers.
Gould J
Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7510):S52-3. PubMed ID: 25054851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. It's money! Real-world grant experience through a student-run, peer-reviewed program.
Dumanis SB; Ullrich L; Washington PM; Forcelli PA
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 24006391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding.
Fortin JM; Currie DJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65263. PubMed ID: 23840323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis.
Burns KEA; Straus SE; Liu K; Rizvi L; Guyatt G
PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002935. PubMed ID: 31613898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of research investment on scientific productivity of junior researchers.
Farrokhyar F; Bianco D; Dao D; Ghert M; Andruszkiewicz N; Sussman J; Ginsberg JS
Transl Behav Med; 2016 Dec; 6(4):659-668. PubMed ID: 27351991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Do I Review Thee? Let Me Count the Ways: A Comparison of Research Grant Proposal Review Criteria Across US Federal Funding Agencies.
Falk-Krzesinski HJ; Tobin SC
J Res Adm; 2015; 46(2):79-94. PubMed ID: 27274713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada.
Tamblyn R; Girard N; Qian CJ; Hanley J
CMAJ; 2018 Apr; 190(16):E489-E499. PubMed ID: 29685909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cash concerns for Canadian scientists.
Hoag H
Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7230):646. PubMed ID: 19194416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Independent investigator incubator (I
Spence JP; Buddenbaum JL; Bice PJ; Welch JL; Carroll AE
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):186. PubMed ID: 30081899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mentored training and its association with dissemination and implementation research output: a quasi-experimental evaluation.
Jacob RR; Gacad A; Padek M; Colditz GA; Emmons KM; Kerner JF; Chambers DA; Brownson RC
Implement Sci; 2020 May; 15(1):30. PubMed ID: 32393285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research funding. Science funding and short-term economic activity.
Weinberg BA; Owen-Smith J; Rosen RF; Schwarz L; Allen BM; Weiss RE; Lane J
Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6179):41-3. PubMed ID: 24700844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
